2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00193-005-0269-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental analysis of unsteady separated flows in a supersonic planar nozzle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 It is important to note that the spectra are broadband with no pronounced peaks or bumps such as the ones noticed in the experiments by Bourgoing and Reijasse. 16 This implies that for the conditions of this experiment, the unsteadiness is not governed by any resonant interactions, but rather by random fluctuations.…”
Section: A Statistics Of Shock Motionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…15 It is important to note that the spectra are broadband with no pronounced peaks or bumps such as the ones noticed in the experiments by Bourgoing and Reijasse. 16 This implies that for the conditions of this experiment, the unsteadiness is not governed by any resonant interactions, but rather by random fluctuations.…”
Section: A Statistics Of Shock Motionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The most commonly considered interactions concern those with a turbulent boundary layer, although laminar or transitional interactions have also been investigated in the literature. Cases under consideration cover a large range of geometric configurations, including normal shock interactions (Atkin & Squire 1992;Bruce & Babinsky 2008;Bur et al 2008), blunt fin interactions (Brusniak & Dolling 1994;Ünalmis & Dolling 1996;Bueno 2006), over-expanded nozzles (Frey & Hagemann 1998, 2000Bourgoing & Reijasse 2005), compression ramp interactions (Thomke & Roshko 1969;Spaid & The characteristic length L used in the Strouhal number represents the effects of the presence of the boundary layer in comparison to a purely inviscid flow (see the scheme in figure 1). It is defined as the observed upstream shift of the shock wave C S due to the thickening of the boundary layer, subject to the imposed pressure jump (or equivalently the angle of deviation of the flow).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words; when NPR increases (start-up process) or decreases (shut-down process), shock wave-boundary layer interaction structure has asymmetry accompanied by transition of RSS to FSS. This asymmetry of the flow could be the manifestation of a Coanda effect which is directly connected to side-loads according to previous work (11) . Consequently, we can confirm from the acquired images that the origin of side loads is in the asymmetric nature of shock wave-boundary layer interaction structure, when the separation pattern changes in the 2D supersonic nozzle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%