2009
DOI: 10.1021/la803434b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and Theoretical Analysis of a Dynamic JKR Contact

Abstract: Analysis of the adhesive contact between solids makes use of contact mechanics, surface physics, and fracture mechanics. The elastic adhesive contacts have been intensively studied, and now, interest still remains about how the viscoelasticity of the solids may be taken into account for the calculation of the work of adhesion, the major difficulty being to separate the surface and bulk energy dissipations. This paper describes a new and original experimental device for "dynamic JKR" tests, which allows us to s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decreasing pull-off force ( f (r 1 , r 2 , z 0 ), equation (12)) obtained, after surface structuring against the plan surface (F vdw plan , equation (11)), can be evaluated from equation (7) or (8). In the follow, and with the observation done on the Figure 8, only the equation (7) modification are exposed:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The decreasing pull-off force ( f (r 1 , r 2 , z 0 ), equation (12)) obtained, after surface structuring against the plan surface (F vdw plan , equation (11)), can be evaluated from equation (7) or (8). In the follow, and with the observation done on the Figure 8, only the equation (7) modification are exposed:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pull-off force is not well understood and must be studied further to enable the advent of reliable micromanipulation techniques. Current methods to measure micro/nanoforces between surfaces are the Surface Force Apparatus (SFA), 7,8 the Atomic Force Microscope (AFM), [9][10][11] capacitive force sensors 12 or nanoindentation testers. 13,14 The modeling of pull-off force is mainly based on two different approaches based on the surface energies on the contact, [15][16][17][18] or on the integration of the van der Waals forces between objects [19][20][21][22] and on some hybrid approaches between both.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pull-off forces are not well understood and must be studied further to enable the advent of reliable micromanipulation techniques. Current methods to measure micro/nanoforces between surfaces are the Surface Force Apparatus (SFA), 7,8 the Atomic Force Microscope (AFM), [9][10][11] capacitive force sensors 12 or nanoindentation testers. 13,14 The modeling of pull-off force are mainly based on two different approaches based on the surface energies on the contact, [15][16][17][18] or on the integration of the van der Waals forces between objects [19][20][21] and on some hybrid approaches between both.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, JKR, DMT or Maugis models are usually used to compute pull-off forces (force needed to split two objects in contact). They are computed with global energy calculation and their efficiency is well established at macroscale [8] but they are not correlated with experimental microscale measurements. These models take into account the impact of the deformation on the pull-off force but they are restricted to sphere/plane contact and cannot be applied to more complex geometries (e.g., parallelepipedic objects) usually used in microhandling [9].…”
Section: The Lack Of Adhesion Model For Micromanipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%