2001
DOI: 10.1086/318630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Confirmation That Inbreeding Depression Increases Extinction Risk in Butterfly Populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
100
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Important functions including disease-resistance, reproduction and population recruitment are damaged disproportionately by inbreeding (Keller 1998;Reid et al 2003). It is thus unsurprising that inbreeding through population contraction leads to increased extinction risk (Saccheri et al 1998;Nieminen et al 2001;Frankham 2005a;O'Grady et al 2006). A decline in habitat quality may contribute to 'extinction debt' before demographic stochasticity finally delivers the coup de grâce (Ford et al 2009;Szabo et al 2011), but inbreeding depression may often drive demographic decline.…”
Section: Fitness Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important functions including disease-resistance, reproduction and population recruitment are damaged disproportionately by inbreeding (Keller 1998;Reid et al 2003). It is thus unsurprising that inbreeding through population contraction leads to increased extinction risk (Saccheri et al 1998;Nieminen et al 2001;Frankham 2005a;O'Grady et al 2006). A decline in habitat quality may contribute to 'extinction debt' before demographic stochasticity finally delivers the coup de grâce (Ford et al 2009;Szabo et al 2011), but inbreeding depression may often drive demographic decline.…”
Section: Fitness Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the loss of genetic diversity detected in the control region of the mtDNA is representative of variation in ecologically important traits (Reed and Frankham 2001), the adaptive and evolutionary potential of the Spanish white-headed duck population may have been reduced by the bottleneck (e.g., Keller et al 1994;Nieminen et al 2001;Frankham et al 2002;Reed et al 2003). Although we did not collect data for contemporary populations in the east, a loss of genetic variation may also have occurred in other regions where populations have undergone a reduction in size (e.g., the population wintering in Pakistan; Li and Mundkur 2003).…”
Section: Implications For Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In natural populations, many empirical studies have also provided supporting evidence for a positive relationship between individual genetic diversity measured at neutral markers and different components of fitness, including disease resistance (Acevedo-Whitehouse et al 2003Ortego et al 2007a), fecundity (Ortego et al 2007b) and survival probability (Hoffman et al 2004;Markert et al 2004), although the possible role of inbreeding in such correlations has been recently put into question (Balloux et al 2004;Pemberton 2004). At the population level, low genetic diversity is suspected to reduce the ability of populations to respond to novel and changing environmental conditions ( Willi et al 2006) and compromise their long-term viability (Saccheri et al 1998;Westemeier et al 1998;Nieminen et al 2001;Spielman et al 2004;Frankham 2005). The level of genetic variation within a population depends on a balance between mutation, natural selection, genetic drift, inbreeding and gene flow, the last four factors being closely linked to the size and spatial isolation of populations (Frankham 1996;Hedrick 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…From a genetic point of view, organisms with a metapopulation structure generally show effective population sizes that are much smaller than the number of mature individuals (Gilpin 1991;Hedrick 1996;Amos & Harwood 1998). This has special relevance for small and isolated subpopulations, because they are theoretically more likely to exhibit reduced genetic diversity and may be more prone to extinction from genetic and stochastic processes than larger and better connected ones (Frankham 1995(Frankham , 2005Saccheri et al 1998;Nieminen et al 2001;Spielman et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%