1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8655(99)00107-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evaluation of expert fusion strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
50
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These rules have the advantage of being simple and not requiring prior training. In this and subsequent studies [38,39], it was found that the product rule is superior to the sum rule when estimation errors are low, but the performance of the product rule deteriorates dramatically as estimation errors increase. We have used both sum and product rules here.…”
Section: Fusion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…These rules have the advantage of being simple and not requiring prior training. In this and subsequent studies [38,39], it was found that the product rule is superior to the sum rule when estimation errors are low, but the performance of the product rule deteriorates dramatically as estimation errors increase. We have used both sum and product rules here.…”
Section: Fusion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…based on fingerprint and iris recognition, and the final decision was taken by using an AND operator. Common theoretical framework for combining classifiers using sum rule, median rule, max and min rule were analyzed by Alkoot and Kittler 6 under the most restrictive assumptions and observed that sum rule outperforms other classifier combination schemes. Ross and Jain 7 presented experimental results by combining three biometric modalities (face, fingerprint, and hand geometry) and stated that the sum rule outperformed better than the decision tree and linear discriminant classifiers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the mean of these N probabilities to give the ensemble prediction. This fusion strategy (equivalent to the sum of experts) was chosen because it is a simple and effective fusion strategy (see Alkoot and Kittler (1999)) that outputs a probability rather than a binary value, and because its predictions were found to be similar to the majority vote (the fusion strategy typically used in ensemble methods).…”
Section: Probabilistic Predictions For Route Blockagementioning
confidence: 99%