1991
DOI: 10.1109/25.97511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evaluation of space/frequency/polarization diversity in the indoor wireless channel

Abstract: A series of experiments that were conducted to evaluate the relative merits of three types of diversities in the indoor portable radio channels at 900 MHz is described. Unmodulated tones were used to probe the channel in a typical university work environment. The statistics of the signal envelopes were analyzed to determine the correlation of the field strengths when the signals are separated in space, frequency or polarization. According to the results presented here, the perforOf a narrow-band system ( < 2oo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the frequency correlation is relatively short ranged, interleaving the data to the whole frequency band is expected to provide a good protection against fading. The spatial correlation does not noticeably depend on distance above half a wavelength, which is in agreement with the results of [13] and [14] for 10 GHz and 900 MHz, respectively. The mean narrowband [12] polarization correlations (averaged over antennas and TX positions) are summarized in Table I.…”
Section: Measured Indoor Radio Channelssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the frequency correlation is relatively short ranged, interleaving the data to the whole frequency band is expected to provide a good protection against fading. The spatial correlation does not noticeably depend on distance above half a wavelength, which is in agreement with the results of [13] and [14] for 10 GHz and 900 MHz, respectively. The mean narrowband [12] polarization correlations (averaged over antennas and TX positions) are summarized in Table I.…”
Section: Measured Indoor Radio Channelssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For Heikkiläntie, Airport and Airport 2, on the other hand, even higher values of 4.9, 4.4, and 3.8 dB, respectively, were obtained. These values are of the same order as those reported for 900 MHz in [14]. For this reason, if the noise level is tuned according to the vertical polarization, the PER performance of 16 QAM in Ruoholahti with four vertically polarized antennas is about 2 dB better than in the case, where half of the diversity branches use horizontal polarization.…”
Section: ) Different Smart-antenna Algorithmssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…All nodes can be treated as anchors or agents; nevertheless N b = 5 positions (labeled B1-B5) have been considered for anchors and N a = 20 for agents (numbered [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] to compare noncooperative and cooperative networks. Range and waveform measurements for each pair of anchor and agent were made for a noncooperative setting (i.e., 5 × 20 links).…”
Section: A Network Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we consider sum-product algorithm over a wireless network (SPAWN), which aims to infer agents positions based on measurements among nodes. 10 Results are given for SPAWN with and without range error mitigation techniques. In the case of range error mitigation, both WED bias model with environmental information and WED bias model with channel state identification based on MAP decision are considered.…”
Section: Case Study: Cooperative Localization-aware Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While polarization does not attract much attention in wireless communications until some new findings, such as six-polarization, polarization filtering (PF) and polarization diversity, have been researched and applied [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Considering the applications of PF in radar and wireless communications for example [17][18][19][20][21][22][23], the usage of polarization extends the available resource domains when dealing with interference suppressions and signal separations problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%