2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.10.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation of wind and temperature induced scintillation effect on optical wireless communication link

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation ( 7) presents the measured phase uncertainty in DASH, including four significant elements, the width of isolated window function, the number of samples, the fringe contrast and SNR of the measured interferogram. To verify the effectiveness of the derived expression, the phase uncertainties were calculated from the simulated fringe patterns using two different approaches, statistical standard deviation of the measured phase error and the derived equation (7).…”
Section: Results Of the Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Equation ( 7) presents the measured phase uncertainty in DASH, including four significant elements, the width of isolated window function, the number of samples, the fringe contrast and SNR of the measured interferogram. To verify the effectiveness of the derived expression, the phase uncertainties were calculated from the simulated fringe patterns using two different approaches, statistical standard deviation of the measured phase error and the derived equation (7).…”
Section: Results Of the Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be specific, the average of each group (100 frames) was regarded as a noiseless interferogram, and the difference between each frame and the noiseless interferogram was treated as the noise of this frame. As presented in [37], the method was used to assess the SNR of each frame interferogram, and the averaged SNR of each group was applied to predict the phase uncertainty through equation (7). Before taking a Fourier transform of the measured interferogram, the dark reference and DC component need to be subtracted from the measured interferogram to reduce the background contribution.…”
Section: Results Of the Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The typical method is performing Fourier transformation of the PSI method, then performing interpolating and merging based on the obtained low-frequency harmonic resampling, to realize the effect of low-frequency compensation. The phase screen of the low-frequency compensation part can be expressed as [5][6][7][8][9][10]…”
Section: Low-frequency Harmonic Compensation Phase Screen Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typical method is performing Fourier transformation of the PSI method, then performing interpolating and merging based on the obtained low‐frequency harmonic resampling, to realize the effect of low‐frequency compensation. The phase screen of the low‐frequency compensation part can be expressed as 5‐10 φSH(m,n)=p=1Npmfalse′=11nfalse′=11R(m,n)f(m,n)exptrue(j2π3pmmN+nnNtrue). ${\varphi }_{SH}(m,n)=\sum _{p=1}^{{N}_{p}}\sum _{m^{\prime} =-1}^{1}\sum _{n^{\prime} =-1}^{1}R(m^{\prime} ,n^{\prime} )f(m^{\prime} ,n^{\prime} )\text{exp}(j2\pi {3}^{-p}\left(\frac{mm^{\prime} }{N}+\frac{nn^{\prime} }{N}\right)).$…”
Section: Low‐frequency Harmonic Compensation Phase Screen Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%