2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.06.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation on mechanical and wear properties of nanoclay–epoxy composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of 4%, NSF types are clearly more dispersed however a roughness surface is appreciated in the polymer. However, this could be related to the correct dispersion of nanoclays, as is observed in the literature [27,43,44], such a huge degree which is clearly increased in the 8%-reinforced nanoclay nanocomposite seems to correspond with polymer degradation. In the case of polar samples with 8% filler, the samples show less appreciable nanoclays, probably due to bigger aggregates.…”
Section: Comparison Between Nanoclay Type and Compositionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of 4%, NSF types are clearly more dispersed however a roughness surface is appreciated in the polymer. However, this could be related to the correct dispersion of nanoclays, as is observed in the literature [27,43,44], such a huge degree which is clearly increased in the 8%-reinforced nanoclay nanocomposite seems to correspond with polymer degradation. In the case of polar samples with 8% filler, the samples show less appreciable nanoclays, probably due to bigger aggregates.…”
Section: Comparison Between Nanoclay Type and Compositionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In the case of 4%, NSF types are clearly more dispersed however a roughness surface is appreciated in the polymer. However, this could be related to the correct dispersion of nanoclays, as is observed in the literature [27,43,44], such a huge degree which is clearly increased in the 8%-reinforced nanoclay nanocomposite SEM micrographs, produced of all the materials, are shown in Figure 6. Nanocomposites with a 2% reinforcement showed clear differences in the particle size, indicating a better dispersion in the NSF type.…”
Section: Comparison Between Nanoclay Type and Compositionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Thus, laminated silicates are normally modified by surface-active substances [ 2 ]. High-strength, stiffness and hardness epoxy that resulted from the incorporation of 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane-modified montmorillonite (MMT) [ 72 ] and trimethyl stearyl ammonium-modified nanoclay [ 92 ] showed better tribological properties. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that filler content, applied load, sliding speed and duration have significant effects on the wear performance of nanoclay/epoxy nanocomposites [ 92 ].…”
Section: Tribological Performance Of Polymer Nanocompositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, whenever CDW contains sufficient amounts of clay materials, the extraction from waste of nanoclays would represent an enhanced upgrading option, since na-noclay does have extensive use e.g., for the improvement of mechanical and wear properties of thermosetting polymer resins including those used in the construction sectors (Shettar et al, 2020).…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%