2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2010.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental kinematic calibration of parallel manipulators using a relative position error measurement system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commonly geometric error calibration methods include external calibration, constraint calibration and self-calibration. The external calibration method [11][12][13] directly measures the pose of the mechanism through external precision measuring equipment, and then identifies the geometric parameters of the moving platform. However, it has several disadvantages such as low calibration efficiency, high cost, and poor external anti-interference ability, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Commonly geometric error calibration methods include external calibration, constraint calibration and self-calibration. The external calibration method [11][12][13] directly measures the pose of the mechanism through external precision measuring equipment, and then identifies the geometric parameters of the moving platform. However, it has several disadvantages such as low calibration efficiency, high cost, and poor external anti-interference ability, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the external calibration method, the constraint calibration method is relatively simple to operate and does not require expensive external measuring equipment, but it restricts the mechanical part motion characteristics, which makes it difficult to identify all kinematic parameters. The self-calibration method [11,14,17] of measuring equipment is used by the extra redundant information of the moving platform to identify its geometric parameters. However, the design of a measurement method for redundant information is needed, and all geometric parameters are hard to be identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In robot calibration, there exists a number of techniques that differ in the measurement equipment, the nature of the experimental data (position, orientation, distance, etc.) and in the opti-mization algorithm that produces the desired parameters [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. At present, the most popular are the so-called open-loop methods that utilize external measurement devices to obtain either a full or partial pose 1 of the end-effector (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the most popular are the so-called open-loop methods that utilize external measurement devices to obtain either a full or partial pose 1 of the end-effector (i.e. position and/or orientation) [22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. However, it should be noted that the manipulator end-effector orientation cannot be measured directly, so the orientation angles are calculated using positions of several points around the end-effector center point (TCP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, research interests shifted to the optimization of calibration algorithm 16,17 and improvement of measurement methods. [18][19][20][21] However, there appears to have been no research on calibration of HMTs by using a bridge-type three coordinate measuring machine (CMM) since it is quite a complex process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%