2013
DOI: 10.1002/sia.5259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental shift allowance in the deconvolution of SIMS depth profiles

Abstract: We study the deconvolution of the secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) depth profiles of silicon and gallium arsenide structures with doped thin layers. Special attention is paid to allowance for the instrumental shift of experimental SIMS depth profiles. This effect is taken into account by using Hofmann's mixing-roughness-information depth model to determine the depth resolution function. The ill-posed inverse problem is solved in the Fourier space using the Tikhonov regularization method. The proposed dec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An abrupt 10‐nm‐thick layer profile is considered in this section, which we will call “the original profile.” This profile is convolved with the analytical DRF of the MRI model. The DRF parameters are taken from Yunin et al These parameters are typical of the SIMS depth profiling with 2 keV/C s + : w = 2.3 nm, σ = 1.4 nm, λ = 0.3 nm. The DRF used here is calculated for a delta‐layer positioned at z 0 = 7 nm, and it starts at depth z i = 0 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An abrupt 10‐nm‐thick layer profile is considered in this section, which we will call “the original profile.” This profile is convolved with the analytical DRF of the MRI model. The DRF parameters are taken from Yunin et al These parameters are typical of the SIMS depth profiling with 2 keV/C s + : w = 2.3 nm, σ = 1.4 nm, λ = 0.3 nm. The DRF used here is calculated for a delta‐layer positioned at z 0 = 7 nm, and it starts at depth z i = 0 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of these advantages, the MRI model is very rarely used by authors that prefer using deconvolution methods. A few authors used it, but only in the case of noniterative deconvolution (see, eg, Yunin et al). This is probably due to the lack of an analytical expression for the MRI model, which has been proposed only recently .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also ways of improving depth resolution on a measured SIMS profile, like profile deconvolution with account for the depth resolution function (DRF) . It is obvious that in our case, the resolution will be getting worse throughout the profiling process because of the instrumental contribution, specifically, an increasing curve of the sputter crater bottom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Challenging applied problems of the SIMS technique include obtaining high depth resolution along with a high speed of profiling, upgrading of sensitivity to small impurity concentrations, and extending the dynamic range of detection, reducing the size of analyzed areas for an on‐chip microanalysis. A variety of methods has been proposed towards solution of those problems, from technical modernization to further development of experimental techniques to processing of experimental data and special preparation of samples . The commonly used approaches to depth profiling on the conventional equipment fail to meet all of the requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38][39][40][41] However, precise quantitative analysis of thin layers is additionally complicated by the shift and broadening of the measured profiles. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] The SIMS depth resolution is limited both by the features of the specimen and the essential influence of the primary sputtering-ion beam. [18,19,26] The SIMS experimental distortions become especially crucial in the analysis of GaN-based HEMT structures with nanometer-thin layers, whose thickness is comparable with the depth resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%