IEEE 2011 International SOI Conference 2011
DOI: 10.1109/soi.2011.6081794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study of carrier transport in ultra-thin body GeOI MOSFETs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak hole mobility for the 20-nm-thick-GeOI MOSFETs is 122 cm 2 /Vs with substrate impurity concentration of around 2 × 10 17 cm −3 . This mobility value is 20% higher than that of a GeOI p-MOSFET based on Smart Cut GeOI wafers with 1ower than 2 × 10 14 cm −3 doping concentration and the same Ge layer thickness, 14 which is also shown in Figure 3a. The higher hole mobility in low field of the present 20-nm-thick-GeOI MOSFETs than that of the Smart Cut GeOI MOSFETs could be explained by a decrease of Coulomb scattering due to MOS interface charges at the Ge/BOX interfaces, which could be induced by the better interfacial properties of the Ge/GeO x interface introduced by plasma post oxidation than those of the Ge/SiO 2 interface in the commercial GeOI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The peak hole mobility for the 20-nm-thick-GeOI MOSFETs is 122 cm 2 /Vs with substrate impurity concentration of around 2 × 10 17 cm −3 . This mobility value is 20% higher than that of a GeOI p-MOSFET based on Smart Cut GeOI wafers with 1ower than 2 × 10 14 cm −3 doping concentration and the same Ge layer thickness, 14 which is also shown in Figure 3a. The higher hole mobility in low field of the present 20-nm-thick-GeOI MOSFETs than that of the Smart Cut GeOI MOSFETs could be explained by a decrease of Coulomb scattering due to MOS interface charges at the Ge/BOX interfaces, which could be induced by the better interfacial properties of the Ge/GeO x interface introduced by plasma post oxidation than those of the Ge/SiO 2 interface in the commercial GeOI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 51%
“…12 This weaker mobility degradation with thinning GeOI thickness for the present devices might be attributable to the better MOS interface quality with BOX by using the GeO x /Ge interface, which is evident in the high mobility in bulk Ge MOSFETs with the same interface. 9,10 The comparison between the mobility of present devices and the back channel mobility of the Smart Cut devices (Ge/SiO 2 interface) 14 is also shown in Figure 3c. The higher mobility of the present devices suggests that the Ge/BOX interface properties have been improved by the Ge/GeO x interfaces formed by the present method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the strain engineering in Ge thin layer via Sn alloying may have also positive influence on the carrier mobility. Figure 4 shows the comparison between our best obtained results and single crystalline GeOI made by Smart Cut and epitaxial layer transfer method [22,23]. In the case of n-type GeOI, the epitaxial Ge and GeOI made by SmartCut method have much higher electron mobility than our samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…11 summarizes the full width at half maximum (FWHM) values of (111) and (100) GOI substrates as a function of TGOI. FWHM values of UTB GOI layers, reported previously, are also added as references [18,19]. An increase in FWHM values is commonly observed in UTB regions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%