Experimental study of Internet stability and backbone failures

Labovitz, Craig; Ahuja, Abha; Jahanian, Farnam

doi:10.1109/ftcs.1999.781062

Cited by 148 publications

(177 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

171

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The reliability of the current Internet has been studied by Labovitz et al [2]. They have studied different ISPs over several months, and report a median network availability equivalent to a downtime of 471 min/year.…”

Section: Ip Is Robustmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is IP going to take over the world (of communications)?

Molinero-Fernández

McKeown

Zhang³

2003

SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-While it is technically pleasing to believe that IP will dominate all forms of communication, our delight in its elegance is making us overlook its shortcomings. IP is an excellent means to exchange data, which explains its success. It remains ill-suited as a means to provide many other types of service; and is too crude to form the transport infrastructure in its own right. To allow the continued success of IP, we must be open-minded to it living alongside, and merging with, other techniques (such as circuit switching) and protocols that are optimized to different needs. I. INTRODUCTIONWhatever the initial goals of the Internet, there are two main characteristics that seem to account for its success: Reachability and Heterogeneity. IP provides a simple, single, global address to reach every host, enables unfettered access between all hosts, and adapts the topology to restore reachability when links and routers fail. IP hides heterogeneity in the sense that it provides a single, simple service abstraction that is largely independent of the physical links over which it runs. As a result, IP provides service to a huge variety of applications and operates over extremely diverse link technologies.The growth and success of IP has given rise to some widely held assumptions amongst researchers, the networking industry and the public at large. One common assumption is that it is only a matter of time before IP becomes the sole global communication infrastructure, dwarfing and eventually displacing existing communication infrastructures such as telephone, cable and TV networks. IP is already universally used for data networking in wired networks, and is being rapidly adopted for data communications in wireless and mobile networks. IP is increasingly used for both local and long-distance voice communications, and it is technically feasible for packetswitched IP to replace SONET/SDH.A related assumption is that IP Routers (based on packet-switching and datagram routing) will become the most important, or perhaps only, type of switching device inside the network. This is based on our collective belief that packet-switching is inherently superior to circuit switching because of the efficiencies of statistical multiplexing, and the ability of IP to route around failures. It is widely assumed that IP is simpler than circuit switching, and should be more economical to deploy and manage. And with continued advances in the underlying technology, we will no doubt see faster and faster links and routers throughout the Internet infrastructure. It is also widely assumed that IP will become the common convergence layer for all communication infrastructures. All communication services will be built on top of IP technology. In addition to information retrieval, we will stream video and audio, place phone calls, hold video-conferences, teach classes, and perform surgery.On the face of it, these assumptions are quite reasonable. Technically, IP is flexible enough to support all communication needs, from best-effort to real-time. ...

show abstract

Section: Ip Is Robustmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is IP going to take over the world (of communications)?

Molinero-Fernández

McKeown

Zhang³

2003

SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hence, some fault tolerance is required at the highest level. A closing question: with the observations of the current internet in mind [33,22], is the currently so popular IP-over-light scenario able to shortcut today's multilevel fault handling and provide a fast enough reconfiguration and a stable rerouting in a large network where failures are the rule more than the exception? …”

Section: 4mentioning

confidence: 99%

Dependability Issues in Smart Networks

Helvik¹

2000

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The dependency of society and business on telecommunication services is commonly recognized, but is this conception taken into account in our effort towards smarter and more autonomous networks? The objective of the paper is to discuss some dependability issues in the context of these networks and to pinpoint some challenges. As an introduction, a brief review of dependability concepts is given. Next the following issues are discussed: a) strategies for providing a survivable transport network; b) fault-tolerant network nodes vs. faulttolerant functionality on a distributed platform; c) software faults and their consequences like error propagation and network wide failure modes.

show abstract

“…One of the more common forms of Internet failure is disconnection of an organization due to router misconfigurations and link and router faults [6,7]. When such a disconnection occurs, SkipNet's locality properties enable a graceful degradation of functionality wherein local overlay traffic and hence access to data stored in locally defined DHTs still remains possible.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%