2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2003.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on pullout strength of anchor bolt with an embedment depth of 30 mm in concrete under high temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Many authors consider the issues of adhesion stress both analytically [3], experimental [4][5][6][7], as well as numerically modelling [9,10,[16][17][18]. All considerations are based on European ETAG Guidelines [11], Technical Report EOTA TR 023 [11] and British Guidelines [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors consider the issues of adhesion stress both analytically [3], experimental [4][5][6][7], as well as numerically modelling [9,10,[16][17][18]. All considerations are based on European ETAG Guidelines [11], Technical Report EOTA TR 023 [11] and British Guidelines [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A better understanding of the pullout behavior of anchor bolts can contribute not only to the optimization of the design of the anchor system, but also to the improvement of the durability and stability of a structure. Therefore, the pullout behavior of anchor bolts in concrete structures has become a major concern in the past three decades and a lot of experimental studies have been performed [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Likewise, various numerical methods have been adopted to analyze the failure mechanism and the progressive damage of anchor bolts in concrete structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, most of the studies focus on a single pre-stressed cable reinforcement performance or the reinforcing effect is acquired through measuring the strain-stress and the rock deformation (Benmokrane et al, 2000), and also due to the limitations of the hypothesis in the numerical simulation theory as follows (Shu et al, 2005;Dai et al, 2004): treating massive rock or jointed rock mass as an isotropic material, considering the post-yield behavior of geotechnical material as perfectly plastic, assuming fractured rock mass to be viscoplastic material, and simplifying simulation to grouting bolt, which could lead to not ideal results in the calculation. Therefore, the model test of reinforcing a rock slope with group anchorage cable and a more painstaking numerical model of rock material are also the research focus in slope protection engineering (Hashimoto and Takiguchi, 2004). So far, these numerical simulation methods can be classified approximately as follows (Kim et al, 2007;Soparat and Nanakorn, 2008): the direct simulation of the interaction between fracture surface and rock-bolt, whose mechanical behavior can be simulated in detail; the equivalent processing of the reinforcement mechanism and the stiffness matrix of the bolt is not included, which is suitable for complex projects of fractured rocks and group anchorage cable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%