Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Computational Linguistics And Clinical Psychology: From Keyboard to Clinic 2018
DOI: 10.18653/v1/w18-0603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expert, Crowdsourced, and Machine Assessment of Suicide Risk via Online Postings

Abstract: We report on the creation of a dataset for studying assessment of suicide risk via online postings in Reddit. Evaluation of risk-level annotations by experts yields what is, to our knowledge, the first demonstration of reliability in risk assessment by clinicians based on social media postings. We also introduce and demonstrate the value of a new, detailed rubric for assessing suicide risk, compare crowdsourced with expert performance, and present baseline predictive modeling experiments using the new dataset,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
264
1
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(273 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
264
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of the content on Reddit can be leveraged to help an MHP develop an insight into the current situation of an individual, to improve the quality of the diagnosis and intervention strategies if necessary. Shing et al [54] analyzed the postings of users in SuicideWatch and other related subreddits (e.g., r/bipolarreddit, r/EatingDisorder, r/getting_over_it, and r/socialanxiety) for assessment of suicide risk. The critical opportunity to improve upon these efforts is to utilize reliable domain-specific knowledge sources for understanding the content from a clinical perspective.…”
Section: Figure 1: Changing Suicide Risk Of 3 Redditors Over a Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analysis of the content on Reddit can be leveraged to help an MHP develop an insight into the current situation of an individual, to improve the quality of the diagnosis and intervention strategies if necessary. Shing et al [54] analyzed the postings of users in SuicideWatch and other related subreddits (e.g., r/bipolarreddit, r/EatingDisorder, r/getting_over_it, and r/socialanxiety) for assessment of suicide risk. The critical opportunity to improve upon these efforts is to utilize reliable domain-specific knowledge sources for understanding the content from a clinical perspective.…”
Section: Figure 1: Changing Suicide Risk Of 3 Redditors Over a Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior research on suicide risk assessment employs four-label (no risk, low risk, moderate risk, and high risk) classification scheme for categorization of suicidal users [54]. In this research, we provide a C-SSRS-based five-label (supportive, indicator, ideation, behavior, and attempt) classification scheme guided by clinical psychiatrists, which allows the MHP to determine an actionable measure of an individual's suicidality and appropriate care [65].…”
Section: Figure 1: Changing Suicide Risk Of 3 Redditors Over a Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Choudhury et al [13] applied a logistic regression classifier that led to high accuracy results in order to predict suicidal ideation in Reddit users. One of the first demonstration of suicidice risk assesment through Reddit posts, matched with clinical knowledge was very recently reported by Shing et al [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Bi-LSTM is used over sequences of word vectors to capture contextual information between words. Shing et al [1] performed suicide risk assessment of Reddit online posts for specifically subreddit 'SuicideWatch'. They created a dataset of users who posted on subreddit SuicideWatch and their suicide risk level.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An article published by PsychiatryAdvisor in 2016 mentions 6 suicide assessment scales that can be used for suicide risk evaluation of patients 1 . A large number of suicide risk evaluations are conducted through direct contact between an 1 https://bit.ly/2rLLTTg MHP and a patient where the former performs assessments using rating scales or questionnaire [1]. While rating scales such as PHQ-9 2 , or C-SSRS 3 are widely used by the clinical community to assess suicide risk, they can be prone to subjective bias among MHPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%