2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experts in fast-ball sports reduce anticipation timing cost by developing inhibitory control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
37
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
13
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, response locked (Figure S6) and post-hoc analyses (Figure S7–Figure S10) confirm that the single-trial results are not confounded by behavioral differences in responses times. With these results, we confirm previous findings that the stronger frontal inhibitory components may contribute to the experts’ faster reaction times (Nakamoto and Mori, 2008, 2012; Nakata et al, 2012). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, response locked (Figure S6) and post-hoc analyses (Figure S7–Figure S10) confirm that the single-trial results are not confounded by behavioral differences in responses times. With these results, we confirm previous findings that the stronger frontal inhibitory components may contribute to the experts’ faster reaction times (Nakamoto and Mori, 2008, 2012; Nakata et al, 2012). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Additionally, basing their findings on previous work linking No-Go frontal P300 strength to response inhibition, they found greater P300 amplitudes in baseball players when the SRC was similar to baseball batting. More recently, the same group showed that baseball players, performing a Go/No-Go task in which the subjects needed to coincide their response to the arrival of a moving object, had larger amplitude N2s and P300s compared to controls (Nakamoto and Mori, 2012). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result was supported by the previous findings that athletes exhibited faster than non-athletes during reaction time tasks, and the faster responses stimulus discrimination and response selection ability possibly due to athletes’ enhanced attention and inhibitory control ability (Hung et al, 2004; Di Russo et al, 2006; Nakamoto and Mori, 2008, 2012; Muraskin et al, 2015). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This may be the result of shorter visuomotor delay and efficient reprogramming of motor responses within limited time periods (Nakamoto and Mori 2012). According to Knyazev, functional delta oscillations appear to be implicated in the synchronization of brain activity with autonomic functions and in cognitive processes related to attention and the detection of motivationally salient stimuli in the environment (Knyazev 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%