2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-020-01478-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explanatory priority monism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, it is the genus under which metaphysical, causal, and any other transitive, asymmetric, irreflexive explanatory priority relations fall (cf. Schaffer 2016, Bennett 2017, Wilhelm 2021.…”
Section: Objectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, it is the genus under which metaphysical, causal, and any other transitive, asymmetric, irreflexive explanatory priority relations fall (cf. Schaffer 2016, Bennett 2017, Wilhelm 2021.…”
Section: Objectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El punto es que si hay un tipo de explicación que sigue la pista de la relación de construcción es porque realmente hay un tipo de relación de dependencia ontológica que respalda la explicación (contra Schaffer) (vid. Wilhelm (2020)).…”
unclassified