2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting jasmonate-induced responses for field protection of conifer seedlings against a major forest pest, Hylobius abietis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
106
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
12
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jasmonates are known to induce physical and chemical defences in conifers, and MeJA application was shown to elevate concentrations of terpene and phenolic defence chemicals in radiata pine and to induce resistance against D. sapinea (Gould et al 2009) and also the large pine weevil Hylobius abietis (L.) (Zas et al 2014). The modes of action were not investigated but based on previously reported evidence, it is proposed that disease control is primarily attributable to an induction of host resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jasmonates are known to induce physical and chemical defences in conifers, and MeJA application was shown to elevate concentrations of terpene and phenolic defence chemicals in radiata pine and to induce resistance against D. sapinea (Gould et al 2009) and also the large pine weevil Hylobius abietis (L.) (Zas et al 2014). The modes of action were not investigated but based on previously reported evidence, it is proposed that disease control is primarily attributable to an induction of host resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jasmonates are known to induce physical and chemical defences in conifers, and MeJA application was shown to elevate concentrations of terpene and phenolic defence chemicals in radiata pine and to induce resistance against D. sapinea (Gould et al 2009) and also the large pine weevil Hylobius abietis (L.) (Zas et al 2014). Apical growth of MeJA-treated seedlings was less than that of non-inoculated seedlings during the post-inoculation period, although this may not be attributable solely to disease because MeJA is known to cause a transient reduction in seedling growth (Gould et al 2008;Zas et al 2014). Aside from crooking of the growing tip and needle death, infection of radiata pine with C. acutatum is also characterized by physiological symptoms including thickening of the stem and slowing down of apical growth (Nair and Corbin 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These prophylactic measures are, however, relatively expensive to apply. The need for alternative methods to reduce damage by this pest remains high, motivating research initiatives focused on, e.g., the use of chemical elicitors to improve seedling resistance (Fedderwitz et al 2016;Zas et al 2014) or biological control of the pine weevil by nematodes (Williams et al 2013). …”
Section: Communicated By F Isikmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches include the selection of more resistant material in breeding programmes (Zas et al 2017) and to enhance the defence of seedlings by methyl jasmonate treatment in the nursery (Zas et al 2014;Fedderwitz et al 2016;Lundborg et al 2016a;Lundborg et al 2016b). Thus, planting regeneration areas with less palatable seedlings should result in less damage occurring to planted seedlings; instead, feeding may be redirected to alternative food sources, such as bark of branches and roots of mature conifer trees, where no economic harm is caused.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This question becomes especially relevant as new seedling protection methods involve the development of better-defended seedlings by decreasing their palatability (Holopainen et al 2009;Zas et al 2014). For example, seedlings treated with methyl jasmonate -a naturally occurring plant hormone -are less likely to be fed on if other food sources are available (Zas et al 2014;Fedderwitz et al 2016). This protective effect, however, tends to disappear in a no-choice situation (Fedderwitz et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%