Exploring integrated ArtScience experiences to foster nature connectedness through head, heart and hand

Abstract

Human activities continue to inflict profound detrimental impacts on biodiversity, yet we have not observed a commensurate shift in people's mindsets to achieve a more harmonious relationship between people and nature. As such, the need to shift the publics' perspective and awareness of their interconnectedness with nature continues to drive education and communication programs that aim to deepen the connection between people and nature. This has led to mounting interest in integrating art with science as an influential communication practice to tackle complex concepts such as climate change and biodiversity loss. Art can provide alternative pathways of knowing and understanding the ecological crisis through provoking embodied, mindful and emotional responses. The arts create a dais for personal expression and reflection that traditional education and outreach methods typically cannot. Here, we explore an art‐based approach to science communication and nature connectedness through a series of participatory ArtScience workshops. These workshops were delivered at The Living Pavilion, an Indigenous‐led, temporary event space that took place in Melbourne, Australia. An integrated and transdisciplinary approach using interactive and participatory ArtScience workshops underpins the key outcomes and findings of this research. Our analysis revealed three themes emerging from the participants' experience: discovery, where participants learn or discover something new about biodiversity which is a thrilling and motivating experience; being in a state of flow, where participants are intrinsically motivated, focused and find joy in the activity; and attunement, where participants experience ecological awareness, relational knowing and a mindful connection to nature. Integrating the head, heart and hands' learning framework into the ArtScience workshops allowed a more nuanced and ground‐up approach to our research and helped further understanding of how people create connections to more than human nature. The interrelated themes of discovery, flow and attunement open the potential for new ways of noticing and knowing nature, creating an embodied and holistic relationship with the more than human world. We suggest this is a strong foundation to deepen ecological awareness, which may lead to subtle yet positive changes in attitudes and behaviours towards biodiversity at a local level. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Elucidating human–nature connectedness in three EU countries: A pro‐environmental behaviour perspective

“…However, specially designed education or participation in creative activities (e.g. habitat restoration) can enhance nature connectedness also among adults (Down et al, 2022; Furness, 2021; Renowden et al, 2022; Richardson, Passmore, et al, 2020). We believe that more research is needed to study the younger group of males and females (college age), as well as more complex variables connected to gender dimensions (i.e.…”

The role of pre-19th century art in conservation biology: An untapped potential for connecting with nature

“…In a similar way, a large part of the science of environmental education has been dedicated to the mediation of biodiversity conservation through simple activities that enhance aesthetic experiences and promote engagement with nature's beauty (Barrable, 2019). Such activities include, for instance, simple exposure to nature (Barragan Jason et al, 2022), spending some time each day noticing beautiful things in the nearby natural environment (Richardson et al, 2020), engaging with nature's beauty through artistic creation inspired by nature-based sources (Renowden et al, 2022), or viewing visual arts and performances intended to create empathy towards nature and improve knowledge about environmental concerns (Curtis et al, 2014). Facing the current general tendency of disconnection with nature (Soga and Gaston, 2016;Ives et al, 2018), several mediation tools based on indirect exposure have also been examined, revealing a positive effect on NC (Barragan Jason et al, 2022).…”

“…Another way to link art to environmental education, known as Art-Science, involves using scientific data, processes or knowledge as supports for artistic projects (Lesen et al, 2016). Aesthetic learning and Art-Science initiatives are often based on participatory practices (see for example Curtis et al, 2014;Harrower et al, 2018;Renowden et al, 2022). A number of Art-Science artworks intended for large audiences have resulted from collaborations between artists, stakeholders and scientists.…”

“…Ensuing problems may include sampling bias in the recruitment of participants, or artistic practices that are not always suitable for all participants. For example, Renowden et al (2022) reported that some participants felt 'infantilized' during a workshop where they were asked to recreate frog songs using everyday objects. Initiatives based on the aesthetic reception of artwork may be experienced by large audiences, where individuals can engage in an aesthetic experience in keeping with their own disposition and sensibilities.…”

The City Nature Challenge – A global citizen science phenomenon contributing to biodiversity knowledge and informing local government practices

“…Remnant bushland, public parks, and other types of greenspace typically visited by urban bioblitz participants embody the day-to-day opportunity to be in contact with nature for the majority of city dwellers. Not surprisingly, a wide range of urban stakeholders – from researchers, practitioners, built-environment professionals, conservationists, and policymakers to wildlife gardeners, Indigenous communities, ArtScience advocates, and friends-of-groups – are increasingly, and often synergistically, working towards promoting and demonstrating the benefits of urban greenspaces for both people and the rest of nature (Aronson et al 2017, Cumpston 2020, Lepczyk et al 2017, Mata et al 2020, Mumaw and Mata 2022, Nilon et al 2017, Parris et al 2018, Renowden et al 2022, Soanes et al 2019). Urban bioblitzes provide an opportunity to simultaneously gather biodiversity records across greenspace networks (Rega-Brodsky et al 2022) and strengthen the link between city dwellers and the governance of biodiversity and ecosystems in urban environments (McPhearson et al 2016).…”