2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11191-021-00272-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Pre-service Biology Teachers’ Informal Reasoning and Decision-Making About COVID-19

Abstract: The world has been fighting with the novel COVID-19 pandemic, which has scientific, societal, and ethical components, and thus it can be classified as one of the most challenging socio-scientific issues (SSI) of our era. The pandemic required individuals to make decisions on a variety of issues, and these decision-making processes are highly related to informal reasoning and individuals' scientific literacy (SL). Thus, this paper aims to investigate the N = 26 pre-service biology teachers' informal reasoning a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Education in the 21st century aims to prepare students to become a global society (Mun et al, 2015). The educational process should emphasize the mastery of scientific literacy skills in students (Altun-Yalçln et al, 2011;Gormally et al, 2012;Han-Tosunoglu & Ozer, 2022;Karışan & Zeidler, 2016;Özdem et al, 2010;Ozden, 2020;Soobard & Rannikmäe, 2011;S. Wu et al, 2018), because scientific literacy is not only a supporting factor for success in the 21st century and an era knowledge based economy (Adnan et al, 2021;Boh Podgornik et al, 2017;Suwono et al, 2017), but also includes responsibility and cultural aspects (Allison & Goldston, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Education in the 21st century aims to prepare students to become a global society (Mun et al, 2015). The educational process should emphasize the mastery of scientific literacy skills in students (Altun-Yalçln et al, 2011;Gormally et al, 2012;Han-Tosunoglu & Ozer, 2022;Karışan & Zeidler, 2016;Özdem et al, 2010;Ozden, 2020;Soobard & Rannikmäe, 2011;S. Wu et al, 2018), because scientific literacy is not only a supporting factor for success in the 21st century and an era knowledge based economy (Adnan et al, 2021;Boh Podgornik et al, 2017;Suwono et al, 2017), but also includes responsibility and cultural aspects (Allison & Goldston, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account the results shown in Table 1 above, we try to explain why our respondents use more intuitive and emotive reasoning patterns than rationalistic reasoning, even though at the university level, rationalistic reasoning is reasoning that is expected to be used in responding or making decisions related to SSI issues (Han-Tosunoglu & Ozer, 2022). Regarding this, several factors influence the reasoning of our responses, including religious beliefs, risk considerations, attitudes and views of respondents regarding global issues (such as GMOs and organ transplants), content knowledge, and political identity (Beniermann et al, 2021).…”
Section: Rationalistic Reasoning Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature on decision making categorised several types making decision, such as rationalistic, intuitive, and emotive (Sadler & Zeidler, 2005), head, heart, and gut (Soosalu et al, 2019), rationalistic, moral-based, emotive and intuitive (Han-Tosunoglu & Ozer, 2021). Based on a synthesis of these literature this study uses the terms intuitive (a decision based on individual subjectivity), heuristic (a decision based on knowledge and empirical evidence), and rational (a decision based on rational consideration and common sense).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%