Exploring Temperature-Modulated Operation Mode of Metal Oxide Gas Sensors for Robust Signal Processing

Boiger, Romana; Defregger, Stefan; Grbic, Mirza; Köck, Anton; Mücke, Manfred; Wimmer-Teubenbacher, Robert; Travieso, Bernat Zaragoza

doi:10.3390/proceedings2131058

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Selectivity and stability can be improved with metal oxides such as SnO 2 , WO 3 , TiO 2 , CuO, In 2 O 3 , ZnO, Fe 2 O 3 , as well as the addition of noble metals such as Pd or Pt. Moreover, the definition of a heater temperature modulation, which influences the gas-specific reaction with the sensor surface, allows for a more stable classification of results [2]. However, using temperature modulation, MOX sensors consume several seconds for a single data sample, resulting in a prolonged data collection process.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Data-Centric Performance Improvement Strategies for Few-Shot Classification of Chemical Sensor Data

Mahesh

Scholz

Streit

et al. 2021

The 8th International Electronic Conference on Sensors and Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Metal oxide (MOX) sensors offer a low-cost solution to detect volatile organic compound (VOC) mixtures. However, their operation involves time-consuming heating cycles, leading to a slower data collection and data classification process. This work introduces a few-shot learning approach that promotes rapid classification. In this approach, a model trained on several base classes is fine-tuned to recognize a novel class using a small number (n = 5, 25, 50 and 75) of randomly selected novel class measurements/shots. The used dataset comprises MOX sensor measurements of four different juices (apple, orange, currant and multivitamin) and air, collected over 10-minute phases using a pulse heater signal. While high average accuracy of 82.46 is obtained for five-class classification using 75 shots, the model’s performance depends on the juice type. One-shot validation showed that not all measurements within a phase are representative, necessitating careful shot selection to achieve high classification accuracy. Error analysis revealed contamination of some measurements by the previously measured juice, a characteristic of MOX sensor data that is often overlooked and equivalent to mislabeling. Three strategies are adopted to overcome this: (E1) and (E2) fine-tuning after dropping initial/final measurements and the first half of each phase, respectively, (E3) pretraining with data from the second half of each phase. Results show that each of the strategies performs best for a specific number of shots. E3 results in the highest performance for five-shot learning (accuracy 63.69), whereas E2 yields the best results for 25-/50-shot learning (accuracies 79/87.1) and E1 predicts best for 75-shot learning (accuracy 88.6). Error analysis also showed that, for all strategies, more than 50% of air misclassifications resulted from contamination, but E1 was affected the least. This work demonstrates how strongly data quality can affect prediction performance, especially for few-shot classification methods, and that a data-centric approach can improve the results.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%