2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.97.015012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the supersymmetric U(1)BL×U

Abstract: We study the low scale predictions of supersymmetric standard model extended by U (1)B−L × U (1)R symmetry, obtained from SO(10) breaking via a left-right supersymmetric model, imposing universal boundary conditions. Two singlet Higgs fields are responsible for the radiative U (1)B−L × U (1)R symmetry breaking, and a singlet fermion S is introduced to generate neutrino masses through inverse seesaw mechanism. The lightest neutralino or sneutrino emerge as dark matter candidates, with different low scale implic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite a variety of different breaking patterns of SO(10) symmetry which may yield different extensions of MSSM, most of them lead to similar implications when one considers the masses, decay channels and possible signals for the stop and gluino [143][144][145][146]. Even though they can yield LSPs other than MSSM neutralinos [147][148][149][150][151], stop and gluino either do not directly decay into such LSPs [152] or they do interact very weakly [153]. Unless the stop is NLSP, the neutralino more likely participates in the possible stop signals, and if the neutralino travels longer than about 1 millimeter before decaying into the LSP, then the missing energy in the signals arises due to the missing neutralinos [153].…”
Section: So(10)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite a variety of different breaking patterns of SO(10) symmetry which may yield different extensions of MSSM, most of them lead to similar implications when one considers the masses, decay channels and possible signals for the stop and gluino [143][144][145][146]. Even though they can yield LSPs other than MSSM neutralinos [147][148][149][150][151], stop and gluino either do not directly decay into such LSPs [152] or they do interact very weakly [153]. Unless the stop is NLSP, the neutralino more likely participates in the possible stop signals, and if the neutralino travels longer than about 1 millimeter before decaying into the LSP, then the missing energy in the signals arises due to the missing neutralinos [153].…”
Section: So(10)mentioning
confidence: 99%