2016
DOI: 10.3384/lic.diva-128820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Third-Party Logistics and Partnering in Construction : A Supply Chain Management Perspective

Abstract: L Li in nk kö öp pi in ng g S St tu ud di ie es s i in n S Sc ci ie en nc ce e a an nd d T Te ec ch hn no ol lo og gy y. . T Th he es si is s N No o. . 1 17 75 53 3 L Li ic ce en nt ti ia at te e T Th he es si is s E Ex xp pl lo or ri in ng g T Th hi ir rd d--P Pa ar rt ty y L Lo og gi is st ti ic cs s a an nd d P Pa ar rt tn ne er ri in ng g i in n C Co on ns st tr ru uc ct ti io on n A A S Su up pp pl ly y C Ch ha ai in n M Ma an na ag ge em me en nt t P Pe er rs sp pe ec ct ti iv ve e A An nd dr re ea as s … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(260 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Problematization to new technologies etc. (Ekeskär, 2016;Meneylyuk et al, 2020;Ramilo & Embi, 2014), the transport efficiency within construction is low. Transport efficiency can be seen as transporting maximum amount of materials with as few resources (time, fuel, labor, vehicle, energy, and effort) as possible and by generating minimum resource waste (Sullivan et al, 2010).…”
Section: Problematizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problematization to new technologies etc. (Ekeskär, 2016;Meneylyuk et al, 2020;Ramilo & Embi, 2014), the transport efficiency within construction is low. Transport efficiency can be seen as transporting maximum amount of materials with as few resources (time, fuel, labor, vehicle, energy, and effort) as possible and by generating minimum resource waste (Sullivan et al, 2010).…”
Section: Problematizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has primarily focused on the effects of CLS's in construction from either a supply chain management (SCM) perspective (cf. Ekeskär, 2016, a construction site perspective (cf. Lindén andJosephson, 2013, Spillane andOyedele, 2017), or from a city logistics perspective (cf.…”
Section: Managing Construction Logistics In a City Development Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has focused on the effect of CLS's or third-party logistics (TPL) in construction from either a supply chain management (SCM) perspective (cf. Ekeskär, 2016), the effect that these concepts have on the construction site (cf. Lindén and Josephson, 2013), or from a city logistics perspective (cf.…”
Section: Tight Coupling Loose Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the construction industry, these solutions are still a rather rare phenomenon (cf. Langley, 2016;Ekeskär, 2016), especially when proposed as joint solution for multiple construction stakeholders and projects. The rarity of these solutions indicates that there is a research gap in how these construction logistics solutions affect material flows and costs, as well as how they are perceived by different stakeholders.…”
Section: Tight Coupling Loose Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%