2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10492-006-0023-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exponential smoothing for irregular data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combined, these challenges result in an irregularly sampled first and second order non-stationary time-series not suitable for analysis with standard exponential smoothing techniques. An alternative is damped double exponential smoothing for irregular data [Cipra 2006]. The approach smooths both a damped trend and the component not explained by the trend.…”
Section: Outlier Detection Time-series Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Combined, these challenges result in an irregularly sampled first and second order non-stationary time-series not suitable for analysis with standard exponential smoothing techniques. An alternative is damped double exponential smoothing for irregular data [Cipra 2006]. The approach smooths both a damped trend and the component not explained by the trend.…”
Section: Outlier Detection Time-series Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined with Wright's method for irregularly spaced data, a smoothing algorithm can be derived that is applicable to groundwater hydrographs. From Cipra [2006], the smoothed estimate at time t n , , is estimated from the weighted sum of the current observation, (i.e. the observed groundwater level), the smoothed estimate from the prior time step, , and the damped trend, :…”
Section: Outlier Detection Time-series Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the following year, Velicer and Colby [7] compared four different data-missing methods (the deletion, mean substitution, mean of adjacent observations and maximum likelihood estimation methods) commonly used for autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models time series under 50 different data-missing conditions, their results showing that the maximum likelihood estimation method performed the best under all conditions tested. In 2006, Cipra and Praha [8] made a modification to the double smoothing method that was similar to that Wright made to Holt's method and suggested that the modified double smoothing method performed better than the modified Holt method. However, this comparison may not be fair, because Cipra and Praha did not optimize the coefficients in these methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%