2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2010.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure to bushfire smoke during prescribed burns and wildfires: Firefighters’ exposure risks and options

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
29
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other authors (Reinhardt and Ottmar, 2004;De Vos et al, 2009;Reisen et al, 2011) found strong correlations between respirable particles and CO in prescribed fires and wildfires, however, these results are not fully comparable since the size of respirable particles sampled was different.…”
Section: Correlationcontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other authors (Reinhardt and Ottmar, 2004;De Vos et al, 2009;Reisen et al, 2011) found strong correlations between respirable particles and CO in prescribed fires and wildfires, however, these results are not fully comparable since the size of respirable particles sampled was different.…”
Section: Correlationcontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…The composition of smoke itself depends on several other factors, such as the characteristics of the vegetation consumed, the efficiency of combustion, the fuel moisture content, fire temperature, and the weather conditions (e.g., Crutzen and Andreae, 1990;Levine, 1999;Ottmar et al, 2009). Despite the smoke exposure research studies carried out in the United States of America Ottmar, 2000, 2004), Australia (McMahon and Bush, 1992;Materna et al, 1993;De Vos et al, 2009;Reisen and Brown, 2009;Reisen et al, 2011), Canada (Austin, 2008) and Portugal (Miranda et al, 2005(Miranda et al, , 2010(Miranda et al, , 2012, the current state of knowledge in this field is still limited. The inherent difficulty of monitoring smoke and personal exposure levels during a fire has contributed to this scientific gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…During prescribed burning and bushfire operations firefighters are exposed to a range of hazardous pollutants in particular fine particles, carbon monoxide (CO), formaldehyde and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such as benzene, toluene, xylenes and phenol [18][19][20]. Previous studies have also investigated exposures at structural fires [21][22][23][24], and have found air pollutants of concern to be CO, formaldehyde, acrolein, hydrogen chloride, hydrogen cyanide (HCN), hydrogen sulphide, hydrogen fluoride, benzene, nitrogen dioxide, sulphur dioxide and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been studies of firefighter exposure at prescribed fires (Miranda et al, 2010;Reisen et al, 2011;Adetona et al, 2013) but the effect of prescribed burning on smoke exposure to the local community has rarely been addressed in research (Reisen and Brown, 2009). To our knowledge there have only been two studies attempting to quantify the spatial distribution of prescribed burn smoke pollution close to the source (Pearce et al, 2012;Meyer et al, 2013), and only one of those was empirical (Pearce et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%