2006
DOI: 10.1080/00016480510037014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression of hepatocyte growth factor and c-Met in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract: Positive rates of HGF and c-Met expression in hypopharyngeal SCC were 77.5% and 70%, respectively. HGF staining was significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis and pathologic stage (p < 0.05). c-Met staining was only significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis (p < 0.05). Increased expression of c-Met mRNA (RT-PCR) and protein (Western blotting) was detected in hypopharyngeal cancer tissue.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After title and abstract checking, 36 studies remained for the further evaluating in details, in which 15 articles were excluded for there were no enough data to calculate the survival rate [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], one article was removed because of duplication [28]. So, a total of 20 publications were fulfilled the eligibility criteria [5][6][7][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. Among them, one study was excluded by the poor data quality [45], so 19 publications were included in the final analysis.…”
Section: Literature Searching and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After title and abstract checking, 36 studies remained for the further evaluating in details, in which 15 articles were excluded for there were no enough data to calculate the survival rate [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], one article was removed because of duplication [28]. So, a total of 20 publications were fulfilled the eligibility criteria [5][6][7][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. Among them, one study was excluded by the poor data quality [45], so 19 publications were included in the final analysis.…”
Section: Literature Searching and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signaling through MET results in cell survival, proliferation, motility, migration, and complex morphogenetic processes (2,7,8). Although MET signaling is essential for embryonic development and tissue repair in adults (2), aberrant signaling through activating MET mutations (3,4,8), MET overexpression (9,10), or dysregulated autocrine expression of HGF and MET in tumor cells (9)(10)(11)(12)(13) contributes to malignant progression and metastasis of cancer cells (2,7,8). High serum HGF levels (14,15), MET overexpression (10), and extensive MET phosphorylation (16) correlate with increasing cancer stage, malignant potential, and poor prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in the number of lymphatic vessels in the tumor stroma is correlated with lymph node metastasis (3)(4)(5). Several growth factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF), insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I/II and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) exhibit lymphangiogenic activity (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). Among these growth factors, HGF and its receptor c-Met are frequently observed to be at high levels in the majority of types of solid tumor, and the overexpression of HGF and/or c-Met have also been correlated with the degree of tumor invasiveness (14)(15)(16)(17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%