2010 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics 2010
DOI: 10.1109/isie.2010.5636605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended Kalman Filter for AC drive Sensorless Speed Controller - FPGA-based solution or DSP-based solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that the SPWM with ZSS system is consuming slightly less resources. So it may seem the most appropriate for usage in an FPGA based AC motor control system, as it is done in [11]. However, at a closer look, the SVM is in fact more advantageous, for the following reasons:…”
Section: Fpga Based Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that the SPWM with ZSS system is consuming slightly less resources. So it may seem the most appropriate for usage in an FPGA based AC motor control system, as it is done in [11]. However, at a closer look, the SVM is in fact more advantageous, for the following reasons:…”
Section: Fpga Based Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to make a comparison to a standard software solution, the same sensorless controller has been implemented in a TI TMSF2808 DSP device (100MHz, 32Bit, 12-bit ADC, 2x16-bit multiplier, 16Ko RAM memory, [63]). The same execution routine is preserved and the total execution time has been evaluated to 66 µs [61]. The functions are fully C-coded.…”
Section: E System On Chip Fpga Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in [10] a direct comparison is made between hardware and software implementations, highlighting the hardware advantages. In [29], comparison is made between an FPGA based hardware implementation and a DSP based software solution: the hardware solution is 11 times faster than the software, leading to a much higher controller bandwidth. In [1], the comparison is extended to a MicroBlaze soft processor implementation, which is even slower than the DSP implementation.…”
Section: Simulink Modeling and Design Of An Efficientmentioning
confidence: 99%