2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2018.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exterior reinforced concrete beam column joint subjected to monotonic loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Najafgholipour et al (2017), Allam, Elbakry, and Arab, (2018), Long and Lee, (2015) investigated using 2-D numerical models of reinforced concrete beam-column joints using the finite element analysis, ABAQUS (2018) to measure the strength and its deformation capacity under monotonic loading. The concrete material is simulated using constitutive law of concrete damage plasticity in order https://doi.org/10.15405/epms.2019.12.43 Corresponding Author: Mariati Taib Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of the conference eISSN: 2421-826X 449 to model the concrete stress-strain behaviour in compressive and tensile damage.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, Najafgholipour et al (2017), Allam, Elbakry, and Arab, (2018), Long and Lee, (2015) investigated using 2-D numerical models of reinforced concrete beam-column joints using the finite element analysis, ABAQUS (2018) to measure the strength and its deformation capacity under monotonic loading. The concrete material is simulated using constitutive law of concrete damage plasticity in order https://doi.org/10.15405/epms.2019.12.43 Corresponding Author: Mariati Taib Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of the conference eISSN: 2421-826X 449 to model the concrete stress-strain behaviour in compressive and tensile damage.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrary to the failure mode that occurred in conventional reinforcement beam to column connection, there are three failure modes identified on precast connection consisting three types which are shear, flexural and reinforcement bond failure mode (Allam et al, 2018). By using the numerical analysis procedure, the failure mode can be determined and assessed for the precast beam to column connection.…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have also studied the structural performance of beam-column joints due to the effect of different parameters. For instance, Allam et al [6] carried out a numerical analysis on external reinforced concrete beam-column joints under monotonic loading and discovered that joint failure was caused by shear diagonal tension and that increasing the column axial load increased the beam tip ultimate load. In addition, an experimental study carried out on beam-column joints demonstrated that at the initial stages of loading, an increase in axial load enhances the shear capacity of the joint and reduces its ductility [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allam et al [6] conducted analyses on beam-column joints and found that increasing the concrete strength improves the joint resistance by improving the load-bearing capacity. It was also discovered that there was a nonlinear relationship between concrete strength and ultimate load, which corresponded to the commonly observed nonlinear relationship between the axial compressive and shear strength of concrete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the most seismically vulnerable component in a structure that is typically designed for gravity loads [2]. Recently, extensive research has been on the behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) beam-column joints brought under monotonic loading [3][4][5]. It was found that many beam-column joints designed with the concept of strong column weak beam concept undergo severe shear force during a seismic event causing joint failure [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%