External pressures affecting the adoption of employee performance management in higher education institutions

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to explore the relationship between external pressures and the adoption of employee performance management systems within academic units of Flemish higher education institutions. The literature on contextually based HRM and institutionalism is used to underpin the theoretical propositions.Design/methodology/approachA comparative case study is described to provide evidence for the theoretical arguments.FindingsIt has been suggested that academic units face a set of external pressures, which leads to different employee performance management systems. This study finds that academic units imitate their legitimacy‐based reference group and legitimacy‐driven imitation and the adoption of external employee performance management requirements distort the alignment of employee performance management systems.Research limitations/implicationsFuture research could formally test the relationship between external drivers and the adoption of strategic and integrated employee performance management systems in academic units by using a survey questionnaire.Originality/valueThis theoretical argumentation uses contextually‐based human resource theory and it is explored empirically through an analysis of the specific context of Flemish academic units to explain how institutional and market pressures affect the adoption and configuration of employee performance management systems.

Professional and Organizational Commitment in Universities: from Judgmental to Developmental Performance Management

“…Adopting New Public Management in higher education implies a shift from the traditional academic, self-managed republic of science (Polanyi 1962 ) towards the entrepreneurial logic of managerialism with an increasing role of professional managers and administrators (Clark 2001 ). Within the logic of the republic of science, academic employees have the freedom to set their own goals and priorities according to criteria set by their specifi c disciplines rather than by the institutional needs of their employing university (Decramer 2012 ;Harley et al 2004 ). In contrast, managerialism is a universal mechanism for rationally coordinating and controlling collective action in universities (Deem et al 2007 : 6;Townley 2002 ).…”

Instituições de ensino superior públicas em Portugal: sua administração sob as premissas da new public management e da crise econômica global

“…Decramer et al, 2012;Muscio;Qualione;Vallanti, 2013). Daí a diversificação do financiamento ser apontada como a solução final para as dificuldades financeiras das IES nos tempos que correm (Carter, 2012;Paradeise;Reale;Goastellec, 2009).…”

Research on the Higher Education Management Theory Framework Optimization and Practice under the Internet Background

“…Based on people's thoughts, behaviors, take effective means to tap people's subjective initiative, as enthusiasm and creativity. Managers that the traditional way to orders have not adapted to the requirements of modern management, and replaced by common goals, careful and meticulous ideological mobilization, and to lead by the precept, eventually to be managers could accept education as shown in the following figure [4]. In this paper, we conduct basic research on the higher education management theory framework optimization and practice under the Internet background.…”