2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting drug–drug interactions with hybrid bidirectional gated recurrent unit and graph convolutional network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We extend the multihead attention method with a translation model to capture the relation representations, which are subsequently fed into softmax layers. Using all instances (the cross column in Table 3), our method shows the highest test accuracy among all methods, which is 4.8% higher than our baseline 3 . Through experimental analysis, we observe that the multihead attention mechanism concatenate knowledge graph can detect more positive examples.…”
Section: Compare With Baseline Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We extend the multihead attention method with a translation model to capture the relation representations, which are subsequently fed into softmax layers. Using all instances (the cross column in Table 3), our method shows the highest test accuracy among all methods, which is 4.8% higher than our baseline 3 . Through experimental analysis, we observe that the multihead attention mechanism concatenate knowledge graph can detect more positive examples.…”
Section: Compare With Baseline Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The current tasks of biomedical relation extraction mainly focus on the extraction of binary relations in single sentences, such as protein-protein interaction (PPI), chemicalprotein interaction (CPI) and drug-drug interaction (DDI) [1][2][3]. It is crucial for biomedical relation extraction to automatically construct a knowledge graph, which supports a variety of downstream natural language processing (NLP) tasks such as drug discovery [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BGRU training time is shorter than BLSTM. The F 1 value of BGRU 51 is 87.09% and 75.33% for IMDB and Polarity dataset. This has an increase in the percentage of 0.57% and 0.28% for both the dataset than BLSTM.…”
Section: Experiment-2: Bidirectional Model-blstm and Bgrumentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In recent years, there have also been studies that use a novel approach, i.e., graph convolutional networks (GCN) (Kipf and Welling, 2016 ) for relation extraction using dependency graphs (Zhang et al, 2018b ; Zhao et al, 2019 ). Graph convolutional networks use the same concept of CNN, but with the advantage of using graphs as inputs and outputs.…”
Section: Inferring Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using dependency paths to represent text as graphs, GCNs can be applied to relation extraction tasks. In Zhao et al ( 2019 ), the authors use a hybrid model that combines GCNs preceded by bidirectional gated recurrent units (bi-GRU) layer to achieve significant F-measures. Furthermore, for identifying drug-drug interactions, a syntax convolutional neural network has been evaluated for the DDIExtraction 2013 corpus (Herrero-Zazo et al, 2013 ) and found to outperform other methods (Zhao et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Inferring Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%