2013
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.560.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction of Stress Intensity Factors for the Simulation of 3-D Crack Growth with the Generalized Finite Element Method

Abstract: Two methods for the extraction of Stress Intensity Factors (SIFs) from three-dimensional (3-D)problems are presented: the Contour Integral Method and the Cutoff Function Method. The formula-tions are tailored for the Generalized Finite ElementMethod andmixed-mode 3-D propagating cracks.The case of crack faces loaded by prescribed tractions is also considered. Another contribution of thispaper is a procedure to control the noise of extracted SIFs based on theMoving Least SquaresMethod.The proposed approach prov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is performed with the aid of integration sub‐elements and the computational crack surface, as described in Section 5.3. Solve the linear elastic problem discretized with the GFEM. Extract Mode I, II and II SIFs at every vertex on the crack front of the geometrical crack surface. In this work, the formulation and implementation of the contour integral method described in are adopted. The SIFs are used to determine, at each crack front vertex, if the crack will propagate and the direction and magnitude of propagation.…”
Section: Crack Propagation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is performed with the aid of integration sub‐elements and the computational crack surface, as described in Section 5.3. Solve the linear elastic problem discretized with the GFEM. Extract Mode I, II and II SIFs at every vertex on the crack front of the geometrical crack surface. In this work, the formulation and implementation of the contour integral method described in are adopted. The SIFs are used to determine, at each crack front vertex, if the crack will propagate and the direction and magnitude of propagation.…”
Section: Crack Propagation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the formulation and implementation of the contour integral method described in [76,77] are adopted. The SIFs are used to determine, at each crack front vertex, if the crack will propagate and the direction and magnitude of propagation.…”
Section: Crack Propagation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pressure field close to the front of a hydraulic fracture exhibits a logarithmic singularity, as illustrated in Figure 16. Accounting for the fluid pressure applied on fracture faces in energy-based extraction methods like the J-integral, 55 the interaction integral, 56 the contour integral method, 57 or the cut-off function method 58,59 is error prone. In this work, we use a DCM 60,61 to extract SIFs at the fracture front.…”
Section: Appendix A: Displacement Correlation Methods For Sif Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A characteristic variation of equivalent SIF Δ K eq is then computed using Equation . As a note, the extraction of SIFs is performed using the cutoff function method (CFM) or the contour integral method (CIM) for all three fracture modes. The CFM is more accurate than the CIM because its functional involves only displacement values, whereas the CIM uses derivatives of the GFEM solution.…”
Section: Problem Description and Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CFM is more accurate than the CIM because its functional involves only displacement values, whereas the CIM uses derivatives of the GFEM solution. Further details can be found in . Our implementation of the CFM is limited to planar crack surfaces within the extraction domains.…”
Section: Problem Description and Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%