2020
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202001481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extreme Elasticity Anisotropy in Molecular Glasses

Abstract: Glasses are generally assumed to be isotropic and there are no literature reports of elastic anisotropy for molecular glasses. However, as glasses formed by physical vapor deposition can be structurally anisotropic, it is of interest to investigate the elastic anisotropy in these materials. Micro‐Brillouin light spectroscopy is used in several experimental geometries to determine the elastic stiffness tensors of three glass films of itraconazole vapor‐deposited at substrate temperatures (Tsub) of 330, 315, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, this temperature‐dependent molecular orientation has been observed in organic semiconducting glasses, in which the generic tendency of face‐on orientation at lower substrate temperatures is attributed to the lack of surface mobility. [ 41–42 ] It should be noted that glasses of organic semiconductors are naturally deposited as amorphous states in vacuum, unlike the crystallized DPh‐DNTT evaporated films we reported. Referring to the previous studies, [ 41–45 ] we proposed a plausible formation mechanism of the preferential face‐on orientation at lower substrate temperatures for our crystalline vapor‐deposited organic semiconductors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, this temperature‐dependent molecular orientation has been observed in organic semiconducting glasses, in which the generic tendency of face‐on orientation at lower substrate temperatures is attributed to the lack of surface mobility. [ 41–42 ] It should be noted that glasses of organic semiconductors are naturally deposited as amorphous states in vacuum, unlike the crystallized DPh‐DNTT evaporated films we reported. Referring to the previous studies, [ 41–45 ] we proposed a plausible formation mechanism of the preferential face‐on orientation at lower substrate temperatures for our crystalline vapor‐deposited organic semiconductors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…[ 41–42 ] It should be noted that glasses of organic semiconductors are naturally deposited as amorphous states in vacuum, unlike the crystallized DPh‐DNTT evaporated films we reported. Referring to the previous studies, [ 41–45 ] we proposed a plausible formation mechanism of the preferential face‐on orientation at lower substrate temperatures for our crystalline vapor‐deposited organic semiconductors. We hypothesize that at low substrate temperature, organic molecules are inactive and lack of surface mobility, resulting in only a limited manner to locally reconfigure themselves.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, r a includes the contribution from r b at high W since K (~k n~ra ), the elastic response of a material to uniform compression, is no longer insensitive to stiffening caused by adhesion forces over a large area with radius r b . 47 Summing up this section, the enhanced elasticity in annealed fibers is favored by different processes, which include densification, cementation, and formation of covalent bonds, and their relative contribution depends on the annealing time. The rapid densification process is responsible for the elastic enhancements at short annealing (F-05).…”
Section: Please Do Not Adjust Marginsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there remains a limited understanding of LCE mechanical anisotropy, especially on the microscopic scale. Here, we use Brillouin light spectroscopy (BLS), which offers a unique and the only not contact tool for evaluating the elasticity 39 of LCEs at GHz frequencies through the measurement of the sound velocities and attenuation of acoustic phonons at different wavelengths and polarizations (Fig. 1d ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%