1980
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4804450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extrusion of fractured teeth. The evolution of practical clinical techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After 30 days of extrusion, 3.5 mm of the roots were exposed at an average speed of 1 mm per week. According to some studies, a force of 30-60 g is required to extrude the tooth (2,10,12,13) while other authors reported that forces of 70-150 g were necessary (14). In this case, 70 g of force was exerted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…After 30 days of extrusion, 3.5 mm of the roots were exposed at an average speed of 1 mm per week. According to some studies, a force of 30-60 g is required to extrude the tooth (2,10,12,13) while other authors reported that forces of 70-150 g were necessary (14). In this case, 70 g of force was exerted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus, there is no coronal shift of the marginal bone, facilitating prosthetic restoration as there is no need to reshape bone. 411 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1011 Additional few weeks are necessary for tissue maturation after periodontal surgery, during which period a provisional acrylic crown can be placed. This points out the main disadvantages of this technique: Relatively long time of treatment, long period of stabilization, and the need to use an orthodontic appliance which is not always convenient for the patient, not to forget poor esthetics during treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique restores the physiological periodontal attachment and preserves alveolar bone (Oesterle & Wood 1991, Bondemark et al 1997. Extrusion can be achieved either with the help of removable or fixed orthodontic appliances (Heithersay 1973, Cooke & Scheer 1980, Mandel et al 1982, Oesterle & Wood 1991, Hovland 1992, Bondemark et al 1997. Patient cooperation is a critical factor whilst using a removable appliance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extrusion rate used in case report no.4 & 5 was 1 mm/week. After orthodontic extrusion is completed, the tooth should be stabilized for a period of 7-14 weeks (Heithersay 1973, Cooke & Scheer 1980, Mandel et al 1982, Oesterle & Wood 1991, Hovland 1992, Bondemark et al 1997. It has been reported that with single extrusion techniques, the alveolar bone and gingiva extrude with the tooth, so gingivoplasty is advised just before the beginning of stabilization period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%