2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2020.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication and Investigation of the Suitability of Chitosan-Silver Composite Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous report concluded that a strong interaction force between PCL and AgNPs interface contributes to heightened stiffness/Young’s modulus [ 63 ]. Increment of mechanical properties of polymeric scaffold after addition of filler was observed not only in PCL/AgNPs composite, but also in other materials with similar concepts such as PCL/multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) [ 17 ], PCL/PANI [ 6 ], and Chitosan/Ag [ 64 ] bone scaffolds. In addition, the incorporation of AgNPs was also shown to reduce the scaffold’s porosity from 70 ± 34% (PCL scaffold; Table 3 ) to 60 ± 4% (PCL/AgNPs scaffold; Table 3 ), which is known to be inversely proportional to the scaffold’s compressive strength (i.e., scaffold compressive strength will increase when scaffold porosity decreases) [ 65 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous report concluded that a strong interaction force between PCL and AgNPs interface contributes to heightened stiffness/Young’s modulus [ 63 ]. Increment of mechanical properties of polymeric scaffold after addition of filler was observed not only in PCL/AgNPs composite, but also in other materials with similar concepts such as PCL/multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) [ 17 ], PCL/PANI [ 6 ], and Chitosan/Ag [ 64 ] bone scaffolds. In addition, the incorporation of AgNPs was also shown to reduce the scaffold’s porosity from 70 ± 34% (PCL scaffold; Table 3 ) to 60 ± 4% (PCL/AgNPs scaffold; Table 3 ), which is known to be inversely proportional to the scaffold’s compressive strength (i.e., scaffold compressive strength will increase when scaffold porosity decreases) [ 65 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of innovative techniques and new biomaterials to fabricate porous, osteogenic, osteoconductive, osteoinductive, non-toxic, and biodegradable implants [ 1 , 2 ] with adequate mechanical strength is a challenge for many scientists, doctors, and engineers in the repair and treatment of bone tissue damaged by cancer, osteomyelitis, congenital defects, or accidents [ 3 , 4 ]. Composites based on ceramics (e.g., bioglasses, silica, hydroxyapatite, and titian), polymers (both natural and synthetic such as chitosan, collagen, fibrin, elastin, alginate, hyaluronic acid, polylactic acid) and hybrid bio-composites [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ] are mainly used in bone tissue engineering applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its low toxic effects and biological inertness have been confirmed in studies, both in vitro and in vivo [ 21 ]. However, scaffolds made only with chitosan as the base polymer are characterized by poor mechanical properties including poor tensile strength and low fracture stiffness, fast degradation rate, and low osteoconductivity [ 4 ]. Moreover, it is difficult to control pore size during the fabrication of chitosan implants, which play a key role in osteoblast survival, growth, and differentiation [ 22 ] as well as transport of essential components necessary for bone regeneration, gas diffusion, and removal of metabolism products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particular attention has to be paid to the use chitosan (CS) in tissue engineering [ 69 ] and in self-healing [ 70 ] magnetic triggered supports [ 71 ]. In fact, the cytocompatibility and biodegradability of chitosan even when mixed with gold [ 72 ], silver [ 73 ] and iron oxide nanoparticles proposed this natural polymer as a suitable candidate for tissue engineering. CS is largely used in a mixture with several materials [ 74 ], including hydroxyapatite [ 75 ].…”
Section: Magneto-responsive Scaffolds For Hard Tissue Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%