2020
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.202000108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facile preparation of magnetic graphene oxide/nanoscale zerovalent iron adsorbent for magnetic solid‐phase extraction of ultra‐trace quinolones in milk samples

Abstract: A simple pH‐responsive magnetic solid‐phase extraction method was developed using graphene oxide–coated nanoscale zerovalent iron nanoparticles as an efficient adsorbent prior to high‐performance liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry for determination of ultra‐trace quinolones in milk samples. Various parameters affecting maghemite synthesis and separation such as pH of sample solution, amount of magnetic adsorbent, eluent type, and volume were optimized. The limits of detection are from 3.1 to 13.3 n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, during this time, at least 10 samples can be prepared simultaneously (this number corresponds to the number of places on the shaker). The overall analysis time of our methodology is similar to that of the MSPE-HPLC–MS method 28 (72 min) or SDME-CE procedure 5 (61 min), but much shorter than in EEM-ANWE approach 10 (155 min).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, during this time, at least 10 samples can be prepared simultaneously (this number corresponds to the number of places on the shaker). The overall analysis time of our methodology is similar to that of the MSPE-HPLC–MS method 28 (72 min) or SDME-CE procedure 5 (61 min), but much shorter than in EEM-ANWE approach 10 (155 min).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The LOD and LOQ values evaluated for Cpx were: 0.05 and 0.2 nmol/mL urine and for Ofx were 0.01 nmol/mL urine and 0.05 nmol/mL urine, respectively. The LOD and LOQ of the developed method are lower than for CE procedure 26 and CIEF method 27 but higher than for UPLC-MS/MS method 1 and MSPE-HPLC–MS procedure 28 (Table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In this method, the LOD and LOQ values for both analytes were 0.04 nmol/g tissue and 0.15 nmol/g tissue (5 ng/mL for Cpx and 5.4 ng/mL for Ofx), respectively. The LOD and LOQ values for our procedure were higher than for the methods that use MS detection [ 1 ]: the LOD value for Cpx and Ofx was 0.005 ng/mL and the LOQ value was 0.015 ng/mL for both analytes [ 32 ]; the LOD values for Cpx and Ofx were 0.15 ng/L and 3.0 ng/L, respectively; the LOQ for Cpx and Ofx was 0.2 ng/L and 10 ng/L, respectively [ 33 ]; the LOD value for Cpx and Ofx was 10.1 ng/L and 3.1 ng/L, respectively; the values of LOQ for Cpx and Ofx were 33.8 and 10.4 ng/L, respectively. However, they were lower than for the CIEF method [ 34 ] (LOD value for Cpx was 0.34 µg/mL and for Ofx was 1.20 µg/mL) and for other CE procedures [ 35 ] (for Cpx, the LOQ value was 0.0125 mg/mL).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall time needed to prepare and analyze the meat sample for Cpx and Ofx content equals 55 min (during this time, seven samples can be prepared simultaneously due to the seven places in the vortex). This analysis time is shorter in the magnetic solid-phase extraction HPLC-MS [24] (72 min), single drop microextraction CE [12] (61 min), and excitation-emission matrix with an alternating normalization-weighted error (EEM-ANWE) [25] (155 min) procedure.…”
Section: Calibration and Other Validation Datamentioning
confidence: 99%