1998
DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor analysis of the Children's Depression Inventory in a community sample.

Abstract: The factor structure of the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI; M. Kovacs, 1992) was evaluated in a large community sample of 1,777 children and 924 adolescents. There were 5 first-order factors (Externalizing, Dysphoria, Self-Deprecation, School Problems, and Social Problems) for the child group; the adolescent group yielded the same 5 factors plus a 6th factor (Biological Dysregulation).Confirmatory factor analyses supported the stability and replicability of the obtained factor structures.Both samples yie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

21
267
4
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(298 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
21
267
4
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Depression Depression was assesed with the revised likertscale version of the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI; Craighead et al 1998;CDI;Kovacs 1992). This questionnaire contains 27 items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Depression Depression was assesed with the revised likertscale version of the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI; Craighead et al 1998;CDI;Kovacs 1992). This questionnaire contains 27 items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mean score was computed to create a depression score. The likert-scale version of the CDI is a well-established instrument for measuring depression in non-clinical samples of children and adolescents (Craighead et al 1998;Kovacs 1992). Cronbach's alphas of this measure ranged from 0.89 to 0.93 from Wave 1 to Wave 5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scale has demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity, good internal consistency and adequate test-retest reliability in previous studies (e.g. Craighead, Smucker, Craighead, & Ilardi, 1998;Hodges, 1990). The CDI consists of 27 items; sample questions include 'I'm sad all the time', 'It will never end right for me' and 'I do everything wrong'.…”
Section: Depressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The item scores are combined into a total depression score. As already mentioned, the questionnaire has relatively high levels of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and predictive, convergent, and construct validity, especially in nonclinical populations (Craighead et al, 1998;Timbremont & Braet, 2002 The questionnaire can be interpreted by means of cut-off scores based on the raw total score. A cut-off score of 13 minimises false negatives and is recommended in a clinical sample; a higher cut-off score of 19 minimises false positives and can be used in a nonclinical sample (Kovacs, 1992).…”
Section: Structured Clinical Interview For Dsm-iv Child Edition (Kid-mentioning
confidence: 99%