2020
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.10505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Affecting Patient Decision-Making Regarding Midshaft Clavicle Fracture Treatment

Abstract: Introduction Midshaft clavicle fractures are a common problem encountered by orthopedic surgeons. There remains debate between non-surgical and surgical treatment options for certain midshaft clavicle fractures. Due to the lack of a clear treatment strategy, this presents an opportunity for shared decision-making, which has been shown to be important to patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By clinicians and patients working together during consultations, it is aimed to respect patient expectations and goals, whilst achieving the ability to integrate care plans that clinicians believe are within the patient's interest. A recent paper looking at shared decision-making regarding the management of mid-shaft clavicle fractures highlighted that 67.6% of patients would prefer to make a shared decision with their doctor [ 1 ]. This can be correlated with a recent review in 2020 whereby 54% of chosen papers that included patients and 75% of papers including surgical opinions both displayed a preference for shared decision-making [ 2 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By clinicians and patients working together during consultations, it is aimed to respect patient expectations and goals, whilst achieving the ability to integrate care plans that clinicians believe are within the patient's interest. A recent paper looking at shared decision-making regarding the management of mid-shaft clavicle fractures highlighted that 67.6% of patients would prefer to make a shared decision with their doctor [ 1 ]. This can be correlated with a recent review in 2020 whereby 54% of chosen papers that included patients and 75% of papers including surgical opinions both displayed a preference for shared decision-making [ 2 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%