2020
DOI: 10.1186/s40068-020-00173-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting severe weather threat index in urban areas of Turkey and Iran

Abstract: Background Distinguishing dynamic variations of the climate from the physical urban indicators is a challenge to assess the factors affecting weather severity. Hence, the time-series of the severe weather threat index (SWEAT) were considered in the four urban areas of Turkey and Iran to identify its affecting factors among the climatic variables and urban indicators in 2018. The SWEAT data were obtained from the upper-air sounding database of the University of Wyoming. The climatic variables were extracted fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The independent climatic factors were assumed as the latest diurnal time series extracted from two global databases. On this basis, ten variables, namely surface pressure (Pascals), surface temperature (deg K), upward long-wave radiation flux (ULR) (W/m 2 ), upward solar radiation flux (USR) (W/m 2 ), relative humidity (RH) (%), specific humidity (SH) (Kg/Kg), precipitation rate (Kg/m 2 /s), evaporation rate (W/m 2 ), surface Omega (Pascal/s), and cloud coverage (%) were collected from the Asia Pacific Data Research Center (APDRC) data set, hosted by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) via http://apdrc.soest.hawaii.edu/las/getUI.do , which has been defined by some scholars e.g., Rabbani et al ( 2020 ). All aforementioned variables, by diurnal scale, were extracted based on the geographical position and coordination of each country.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The independent climatic factors were assumed as the latest diurnal time series extracted from two global databases. On this basis, ten variables, namely surface pressure (Pascals), surface temperature (deg K), upward long-wave radiation flux (ULR) (W/m 2 ), upward solar radiation flux (USR) (W/m 2 ), relative humidity (RH) (%), specific humidity (SH) (Kg/Kg), precipitation rate (Kg/m 2 /s), evaporation rate (W/m 2 ), surface Omega (Pascal/s), and cloud coverage (%) were collected from the Asia Pacific Data Research Center (APDRC) data set, hosted by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) via http://apdrc.soest.hawaii.edu/las/getUI.do , which has been defined by some scholars e.g., Rabbani et al ( 2020 ). All aforementioned variables, by diurnal scale, were extracted based on the geographical position and coordination of each country.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For reliable forecasts, π (t) follows a uniform distribution. We use the α index (α) to summarize the reliability in each grid cell with the following equation to check the spatial patterns of forecast reliability (Renard et al, 2010):…”
Section: Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a variable measuring the evaporative demand of the atmosphere, reference crop evapotranspiration (ETo) has been widely used to estimate potential water loss from the land surface to the atmosphere (Hopson and Webster, 2009;Liu et al, 2019;Renard et al, 2010). Quantification of ETo has been increasingly performed to support efficient water use and water management (Mushtaq et al, 2019;Perera et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This investigation also provides valuable implications for the forecasting integrated variables, which need to be calculated with multiple NWP/GCM variables. Variables such as drought index (Zhang et al, 2017), bushfire danger index (Sharples et al, 2009), and severe weather index (Rabbani et al, 2020), are often derived from multiple NWP/GCM variables. Our investigation suggests that improving the input variables may help correct errors that could not be fixed when calibrating the integrated variables directly.…”
Section: Implications For Forecasting Of Integrated Variables and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%