2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00226-020-01222-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing adhesion of bacteria Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and yeast Pichia membranifaciens to wooden surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Biofilms of P. membranifaciens have been also reported in a rotating biological contactor (RBC) for the treatment of wine-cellar effluent [ 49 ]. Tomičić et al [ 50 ] showed that yeasts can adhere to wooden surfaces. This ability is influenced by wood type, disinfectant, relative humidity, and temperature [ 50 ], but not by wood surface roughness [ 51 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Biofilms of P. membranifaciens have been also reported in a rotating biological contactor (RBC) for the treatment of wine-cellar effluent [ 49 ]. Tomičić et al [ 50 ] showed that yeasts can adhere to wooden surfaces. This ability is influenced by wood type, disinfectant, relative humidity, and temperature [ 50 ], but not by wood surface roughness [ 51 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tomičić et al [ 50 ] showed that yeasts can adhere to wooden surfaces. This ability is influenced by wood type, disinfectant, relative humidity, and temperature [ 50 ], but not by wood surface roughness [ 51 ]. The ability to form biofilm on wooden matrixes could represent a problem for wine quality since the spoilage metabolism of some yeast species such as P. manshurica could be maintained during wine aging [ 11 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Staphylococcus aureus) and yeasts (Pichia membranifaciens) artificially inoculated onto the surface of three wood types: poplar, Norway spruce and European beech (25). Although not able to quantify microbial cells, SEM micrographs clearly showed the different adherence behaviour of the species included in the test and indicated that P. aeruginosa was the species that better adhered to all wood types.…”
Section: Sem Analyses Was Also Particularly Useful To Monitor the Adh...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coating of wood materials may decrease or diminish the surface hygroscopicity, thus influencing microbial adhesion and survival [67]. Hedge [16] studied the survival of E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus on untreated and varnished beechwood, and plastic.…”
Section: Hygroscopicity and Capillary Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower microbial recovery and moisture retention of wooden surfaces also lead to the assumption that the microbes are strongly attached to wooden surfaces which could help the biofilm formation [98]. However, many studies have shown that microbial attachment to wood is not stronger compared to other smooth surfaces [67]. In fact, in our recent study, we found that the bacteria attached more to non-porous melamine surfaces and formed biofilm while no biofilm was found on oak wood surfaces in similar experimental conditions [99].…”
Section: Hygroscopicity and Capillary Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%