2018
DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2018.1486550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing continued use of mobile easy payment service: an empirical investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With the support of technical innovations and their features such as efficiency, transparency and convenience, mobile payments have attracted a considerable number of customers and become famous worldwide (Barbara & Lars, 2020). Many types of research have addressed mobile payment adoption in different countries (Gomber et al, 2018;Jun et al, 2018;Liao, 2018;McGovern et al, 2018). Berg et al (2020) explore fintech adoption in the European and Central Asian regions, following the high usage of mobile phones and government initiatives to provide better internet access to both urban and rural populations.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the support of technical innovations and their features such as efficiency, transparency and convenience, mobile payments have attracted a considerable number of customers and become famous worldwide (Barbara & Lars, 2020). Many types of research have addressed mobile payment adoption in different countries (Gomber et al, 2018;Jun et al, 2018;Liao, 2018;McGovern et al, 2018). Berg et al (2020) explore fintech adoption in the European and Central Asian regions, following the high usage of mobile phones and government initiatives to provide better internet access to both urban and rural populations.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have found that all these above factors affect customer intention and adoption of mobile payments (Lee et al, 2015). Other researchers have argued that customers tend to care more about the expected advantages of mobile payments instead of potential disadvantages; they think perceived value could positively affect customer adoption and experience of mobile payments (Jun et al, 2018). Unnikrishnan and Jagannathan (2018) argue that trust was an important variable that was not included in the TAM model and conclude that trust could positively affect the adoption and experience of mobile payments when customers think mobile payment providers and their mobile payment apps are reliable, they prefer to adopt them.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pousttchi [30] classified convenience into three domains, namely the operating sequence (e.g., easy handling and fast processing), the initialization phase before the first use, and the coverage of the procedure. Accordingly, the construct of convenience can be understood as the ease and speed of the system, easy learnability of the payment procedure [30,31], and simplicity in conducting financial transactions [32].…”
Section: Mobile Payment Service (Mps) Success Determinantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study emphasizes and highlights the previous implications related to user perceptions of security and its role in the overall usage environment. Jun et al [32] noted that, when there are excessive complications in the technology security process, these can create an uneasy learning environment for users. Moreover, Iman [37] noted that technology-driven applications could potentially create complexities and burdens to the firms that use either a shared infrastructure or the service platform.…”
Section: Theoretical Insightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence from studies on the adoption of other IT innovations (e.g. mobile payment services, mobile credit cards, wireless mobile data services) supports this line of reasoning (Jun, Cho, and Park 2018;Tan et al 2014;Lu et al 2008). Thus:…”
Section: The Effects Of Piit On Pu Pra and Bi To Adopt A Mobile Walletmentioning
confidence: 87%