Factors Influencing the Selection of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Abstract

Background: Major atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines recommend non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) over warfarin, except in rare clinical circumstances based on 4 randomized controlled trials comparing each NOAC with warfarin. We aimed to investigate the current NOAC prescription behaviors in alignment with the recent clinical evidence available. Method: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of NOAC-using patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who were aged ≥65 years on the index date (July 1, 2018) based on nationwide claims data. The types of NOACs being taken were analyzed using chi-squared tests, and factors influencing NOAC selection were identified using multinomial logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 6,061 patients were included. Among the 4 NOACs, rivaroxaban was the most used NOAC. Patients aged ≥75 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.270, confidence interval [CI] = 1.089-1.450) and women (OR = 1.148, CI = 1.011-1.284) were more likely to use apixaban relative to rivaroxaban. Patients with prior stroke/transient ischemic attack/thromboembolism had higher odds of using dabigatran (OR = 1.508, CI = 1.312-1.704) and apixaban (OR = 1.186, CI = 1.026-1.346). Patients with renal disease had higher odds of using apixaban (OR = 1.466, 95% CI = 1.238-1.693). These findings are consistent with the efficacy and safety profiles reported in pivotal trials and observational studies comparing individual NOACs. Conclusion: Among the 4 NOACs, rivaroxaban was the most commonly used NOAC. Apixaban was preferred for patients aged ≥75 years, females, and patients with renal disease.

Consensus on Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation and Utilization of NOACs in the Real-World Setting in India

“…These findings are consistent with the efficacy and safety profiles reported in pivotal trials and observational studies comparing individual NOACs. 37 The factors influencing OAC prescription for AF are not well understood. Hence, the current DELPHI method was adopted to understand the factors affecting the choice of NOAC by Indian experts in the real-world setting based on their experience with different NOACs.…”