1978
DOI: 10.2307/2259185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Influencing the Spatial Distribution of Phytoplankton in a Small Productive Lake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
97
1
4

Year Published

1983
1983
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
9
97
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It has long been known that the spatial distribution of phytoplankton species is driven by interactions between physical and biological processes (Fietz et al, 2005;Hillmer et al, 2008) and that wind has an important role in these physical processes (George and Heaney, 1978;Schernewski et al, 2005;Moreno-Ostos et al, 2008;Alexander and Imberger, 2009;Pobel et al, in press). However, all existing knowledge was mainly based on the study of phytoplankton communities living in the well-mixed epilimnetic layer, the spatial distribution of which is affected by direct forcing by the wind.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has long been known that the spatial distribution of phytoplankton species is driven by interactions between physical and biological processes (Fietz et al, 2005;Hillmer et al, 2008) and that wind has an important role in these physical processes (George and Heaney, 1978;Schernewski et al, 2005;Moreno-Ostos et al, 2008;Alexander and Imberger, 2009;Pobel et al, in press). However, all existing knowledge was mainly based on the study of phytoplankton communities living in the well-mixed epilimnetic layer, the spatial distribution of which is affected by direct forcing by the wind.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher Chl-a concentration in the upstream part of the lake can be due to wind transport from downstream, in particular along the sheltered northern shore, where currents from upstream and downstream merge (Figure 5a), advecting phytoplankton from both directions. In this area, the small inflow from two drainage channels (not reproduced in the model) can contribute to the formation of local phytoplankton patches due to additional nutrients discharge [9,19]. Phytoplankton accumulation seems to follow the path of the significant backflow induced by the main gyre.…”
Section: Data and Simulation Analysesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to Verhagen [7], a likely time scale for algal growth and decay is ~10 d. Therefore, having the usual advection time scales in the order of a few hours [8][9][10][11], phytoplankton can be assumed to be passively transported, except for very large shallow lakes. Time scales for phytoplankton horizontal distribution can then be assimilated to the ones of lake circulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both phototaxis (Forward 1976) and geotaxis (Eppley et al 1968, Cullen & Horrigan 1981 have been invoked to explain the directionality of swimming behavior, with a variety of physical and chemical factors regulating the extent of vertical movement. These include nutrients (Eppley et al 1986, Cullen & Horrigan 1981, Heaney & Eppley 1981; light intensity (Harris et al 1979, Heaney & Talling 1980; temperature or salinity gradients (Seliger et al 1970, Kamykowski & Zentara 1977, Tyler & Seliger 1978; and oxygen availability (Heaney 1976, George & Heaney 1978. It is now clear that individual species can respond differently to these parameters (Eppley et al 1968, Heaney & Eppley 1981 Contribution No.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%