2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure of silicone gel breast implants: Is the mechanical weakening due to shell swelling a significant cause of prostheses rupture?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the present data demonstrated mechanical weakening of PIP shells compared with medical‐grade shells and variability within the PIP cohort. Although differences between intact and ruptured PIP implants were not significant statistically, this trend should not be underestimated; a larger implant cohort may have resulted in a statistically significant difference, as demonstrated by Necchi and colleagues. Clinical observations have previously suggested the presence of two distinct subpopulations of PIP implants: those manufactured from suboptimal industrial silicone that are more susceptible to rupture and those containing ‘normal’ appearing silicones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Nevertheless, the present data demonstrated mechanical weakening of PIP shells compared with medical‐grade shells and variability within the PIP cohort. Although differences between intact and ruptured PIP implants were not significant statistically, this trend should not be underestimated; a larger implant cohort may have resulted in a statistically significant difference, as demonstrated by Necchi and colleagues. Clinical observations have previously suggested the presence of two distinct subpopulations of PIP implants: those manufactured from suboptimal industrial silicone that are more susceptible to rupture and those containing ‘normal’ appearing silicones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Necchi et al (2011) obtained the shell mechanical properties of silicone gel-filled breast implants by means of tensile, dynamic mechanical and tear tests. Prager-Khoutorsky et al (2011) measured the rigidity of PDMS substrates with an Instron (Instron Ltd, UK) universal testing machine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, standard failure statistics according to Weibull statistics (Fig. ) can be utilized to reveal reliable data due to the higher amount of data taken into consideration per implant in contrast to former studies where only about one to 13 tensile specimens per implant were analysed: P=1expσbσ0m …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, after extraction of the silicone that had diffused into the shell from the gel, the mechanical properties of the shell were almost restored. Necchi et al investigated the failure of the recent implant generation being implanted between a half and 13 years. This group confirmed the results of Brandon and co‐workers but came to the conclusion that the weakening of the shell due to swelling is the major reason for the failure of silicone breast implants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation