2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failures to see: Attentive blank stares revealed by change blindness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In gaze-tracking studies, it has been found that gaze lingers at the site of change after its presentation for a significantly longer time compared to other locations, indicating change registration and localization at some level . This also accords with the observation that changes may even be fixated at the moment of change (Caplovitz, Fendrich, & Hughes, 2008), and that change detection is highly task-dependent (Triesch, Ballard, Hayhoe, & Sullivan, 2003).…”
Section: Implicit Change Detectionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In gaze-tracking studies, it has been found that gaze lingers at the site of change after its presentation for a significantly longer time compared to other locations, indicating change registration and localization at some level . This also accords with the observation that changes may even be fixated at the moment of change (Caplovitz, Fendrich, & Hughes, 2008), and that change detection is highly task-dependent (Triesch, Ballard, Hayhoe, & Sullivan, 2003).…”
Section: Implicit Change Detectionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…As described above, focal attention to the change location does not guarantee conscious detection of the change (Caplovitz et al, 2008;. The contents have to be additionally encoded for visual working memory, and only these contents eventually reach consciousness (Kiefer et al, 2011).…”
Section: The Influence Of the Implicit Change Detection On The Explicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sum, these results suggest that although attention is tightly linked to and most probably necessary for detection and identification of change, neither feature-selective nor spatial attention appears to be sufficient for change detection and identification. Similar conclusions have been derived from studies that found change blindness even for objects that are fixated or at the focus of attention (Caplovitz, Fendrich, & Hughes, 2007;OʼRegan et al, 2000;Levin & Simons, 1997).…”
Section: Change Blindness and Attentionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The change blindness paradigm may thus better reveal the implicit attentional shift to direct gaze and the ensuing detection enhancement than either the interocular suppression or the visual search paradigms. Focal attention to change is not, however, sufficient for conscious detection of change: attention can be directed to changes, i.e., they can be stared at "blankly" without perceiving the change (e.g., Caplovitz, Fendrich, & Hughes, 2008). A further consolidation process supported by working memory seems to be required for conscious detection (Jensen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%