2020
DOI: 10.7163/eu21.2020.38.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fake or real EU Territorialicy? Debating the territorial universe of EU policies

Abstract: This paper provides new insights into the main pillars of the territorial universe of EU policies, by undertaking a systematic overview of European Union (EU) key territorial development reports, agendas and programmes. These include the European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP), the three Territorial Agendas, and the European Territorial Observatory Network (ESPON) reports. The evidence shows widespread territorialicy, understood as a process of incorporating a territorial driven policy design, implemen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 75 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first contribution, the Editor of this Issue (Medeiros, 2020) puts forward a novel scientific concept (of territorialicy), which is understood as a process by which policies have a territorially-driven policy-design, implementation and evaluation paradigm incorporated into them. By doing this, the author seeks to highlight the advantages accruing from this territorially-driven design when it comes to mainstream econometric perspectives, as supported by 'growth' policy rationales, rather than those centring around 'development' or 'cohesion'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first contribution, the Editor of this Issue (Medeiros, 2020) puts forward a novel scientific concept (of territorialicy), which is understood as a process by which policies have a territorially-driven policy-design, implementation and evaluation paradigm incorporated into them. By doing this, the author seeks to highlight the advantages accruing from this territorially-driven design when it comes to mainstream econometric perspectives, as supported by 'growth' policy rationales, rather than those centring around 'development' or 'cohesion'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%