“…These findings reinforce some observers’ concerns about the effects of FEPs, particularly because jurors and juries accept confessions and often convict defendants even when confessions result from FEPs (Woody & Forrest, ; Woody, Forrest, & Yendra, ). Further research, however, should seek to examine how types of FEPs, such as demeanor, testimonial, or scientific FEPs (see Forrest et al, ; Leo, ; Woody & Forrest, ) may differentially affect false confession rates. These meta‐analytic findings provide additional justification for courts to revisit the coerciveness of police deception during interrogation, particularly deception about evidence, (see Bandler, , ; McKinley, ; People v. Thomas , ) as well as for the calls by some scholars for the United States to follow Great Britain in the elimination of police deception during interrogation (e.g., Kassin et al, ; Kassin & Gudjonsson, ; Woody et al, ).…”