2016
DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2016-214784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Familial superior mesenteric artery syndrome

Abstract: Superior mesenteric artery syndrome (SMAS) has an incidence of 0.1-0.3%. It is caused by a narrow angle between the aorta and the superior mesenteric artery, resulting in the clamping of the third portion of the duodenum. It is more common in females (2:1), with no racial differences. It is also more frequent in patients under 30 years and may have a congenital or acquired aetiology. There is only one case of the familial form described in the medical literature. We present a case of a 20-year-old woman, with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The weight loss may simply provoke a further narrowing of a preexisting abnormally acute aortomesenteric angle, and, as a result, the vomiting and compression become self-perpetuating regardless of the initiating factors [ 40 ], particularly since we know that the compression can progress from irrelevant to complete obstruction [ 3 , 72 ]. Evidence of SMAS in individuals with certain skeletal deformities or who have undergone a surgical intervention to correct a skeletal problem suggests that rather than weight loss, certain congenital anatomic factors or post-surgical changes in skeletal conformation predispose an individual to this disorder [ 3 , 5 , 26 , 28 , 50 – 54 , 61 63 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The weight loss may simply provoke a further narrowing of a preexisting abnormally acute aortomesenteric angle, and, as a result, the vomiting and compression become self-perpetuating regardless of the initiating factors [ 40 ], particularly since we know that the compression can progress from irrelevant to complete obstruction [ 3 , 72 ]. Evidence of SMAS in individuals with certain skeletal deformities or who have undergone a surgical intervention to correct a skeletal problem suggests that rather than weight loss, certain congenital anatomic factors or post-surgical changes in skeletal conformation predispose an individual to this disorder [ 3 , 5 , 26 , 28 , 50 – 54 , 61 63 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There may also be a congenital explanation for SMAS that is supported by reports of SMAS in neonates [ 61 , 62 ], identical twins [ 26 ], and within families [ 35 , 63 ]. It may be the case that a higher positioned duodenum within a rather more acute aortomesenteric angle may leave enough room for the duodenum during childhood, but as the duodenum grows with age the available space within the angle becomes insufficient [ 1 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In patients with diagnosed SMAS, the angle of branching of the superior mesenteric artery is below 26 °, the distance between the SMA wall and aortic aorta is 2-8 mm [4][5][6]. A familial susceptibility to the occurrence of SMAS has been demonstrated [7,8]. It mainly affects young children and women aged 18-35 years [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El origen de la AMS está ubicado a nivel de L1, orientándose de manera caudal, creando un ángulo de 45 a 60º en correlación con la aorta. La tercera porción del duodeno atraviesa por el ángulo formado, a nivel de L3-L4, este síndrome se atribuye esencialmente a la perdida de grasa mesentérica que intercede como cojinete entre dichas estructuras (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13).…”
Section: Introduccionunclassified
“…La incidencia exacta de este síndrome no es conocida con exactitud debido a que es poco diagnosticada por su rara frecuencia, además puede existir opresiones duodenales en menor grado que conllevarían a ser un cuadro asintomático. Según revisiones se ha encontrado una incidencia que varía del 0,13% y que no supera el 1% (2,3,6,7,8,9,12,15,16,19,20,21), presentando una mortalidad estimada del 33% (3,18).…”
Section: Introduccionunclassified