2011
DOI: 10.3182/20110828-6-it-1002.02457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FAST: an algorithm for the scenario approach with reduced sample complexity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem can be also written in the form (4), with non-convex cost J(x, y) := − x 2 + y 2 and non-convex constraints − x 2 + y 2 ≥ cos(δ (i) )x + sin(δ (i) )y − 1. We use the form in (36) to visualize the optimizing direction −z, as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Sp Ex [ω]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The problem can be also written in the form (4), with non-convex cost J(x, y) := − x 2 + y 2 and non-convex constraints − x 2 + y 2 ≥ cos(δ (i) )x + sin(δ (i) )y − 1. We use the form in (36) to visualize the optimizing direction −z, as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Sp Ex [ω]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and non-convex constraints − x 2 + y 2 ≥ cos( δ(i) )x + sin( δ(i) )y − 1. We use the form in (36) to visualize the optimizing direction −z, as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Appendix a Counterexample With Unbounded Number Of Support C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may, however, cause an excessive computational effort. To cope with this issue, one can adopt a two-step procedure similar to that discussed in [18,17], where first α = 0.10 is used to optimize both Note that the histograms in Figure 2 reveal a larger variability compared to those in Figure 3. This is due to the fact that the latter results are associated to a value of α that is closer to the desired ε value for the violation probability.…”
Section: Jump Linear Stochastic Systems: a Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may, however, cause an excessive computational effort. To cope with this issue, one can adopt a two-step procedure similar to that discussed in [18,17], where first α = 0.10 is used to optimize both x M 1 0 and h, and then for α = 0.22 only h is optimized setting x M 1 0 equal to the value x M 1 , 0 obtained when α = 0.10. The guarantees provided by Theorem 1 on the re-optimized h still hold for model M 1 initialized with x M 1 , 0 .…”
Section: Jump Linear Stochastic Systems: a Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%