Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Multimedia and Security 2008
DOI: 10.1145/1411328.1411333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and reliable resampling detection by spectral analysis of fixed linear predictor residue

Abstract: This paper revisits the state-of-the-art resampling detector, which is based on periodic artifacts in the residue of a local linear predictor. Inspired by recent findings from the literature, we take a closer look at the complex detection procedure and model the detected artifacts in the spatial and frequency domain by means of the variance of the prediction residue. We give an exact formulation on how transformation parameters influence the appearance of periodic artifacts and analytically derive the expected… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
127
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
127
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Aside from analyzing the n-th order derivative of the interpolated image, Popescu and Farid identified the correlation among neighboring pixels by a local linear predictor that adopts the expectation/maximization (EM) algorithm [6]. In [7], Kirchner analytically derived the relation between the derivative-based detector and Popescu's detector. From the analysis, he proposed an improved resampling detector.…”
Section: Review Of the Major Resizing Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from analyzing the n-th order derivative of the interpolated image, Popescu and Farid identified the correlation among neighboring pixels by a local linear predictor that adopts the expectation/maximization (EM) algorithm [6]. In [7], Kirchner analytically derived the relation between the derivative-based detector and Popescu's detector. From the analysis, he proposed an improved resampling detector.…”
Section: Review Of the Major Resizing Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection of such patterns is eventually considered as an evidence of forgery. Detector [80] is further improved by Kirchner in [53] from the computational point of view. Although its effectiveness is proven on regular images, it is observed in [80] that the method is weaker when dealing with heavily compressed images, where further periodicity is caused by quantization effects.…”
Section: Tampering Detection Independent On the Type Of Forgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper develops a resampling detection algorithm based on the correlation of periodic artefacts from resampling with those of neighboring pixels. It was further studied in the spectral domain using artifacts from the residue of a local linear predictor [3]. In [4], the roles of prefiltering and cyclostationarity of signals are studied in order to improve the performance of the resampling detection algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%