2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast electrochemical detection of anti-HIV antibodies: Coupling allosteric enzymes and disk microelectrode arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As to the determination of β-Gal activity, since electrochemical determination was the most common method to detect the final product (PAP) in the enzymatic reaction [3], we used a commercial kit to conduct the electrochemical assay. The experimental procedure was completely the same with our method.…”
Section: Analysis By Conventional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As to the determination of β-Gal activity, since electrochemical determination was the most common method to detect the final product (PAP) in the enzymatic reaction [3], we used a commercial kit to conduct the electrochemical assay. The experimental procedure was completely the same with our method.…”
Section: Analysis By Conventional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the substrate concentration should be at least 10 times the K m value. The K m value for this enzyme and substrate has been reported to be 0.43 mM [3]. Hence the final concentration of PAPG was set at 4.3 mM.…”
Section: B Determination Of the Activity Of β-Galmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the experiments carried out in redox cycling mode, the collector electrode potential was set to 0 V vs. Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl). The substrate concentration (10 −3 mol L −1 ) and measure conditions had been previously optimized [39]. Data shown are the average from at least three independent measurements.…”
Section: Electrochemical Detection Ofˇ-galmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of electrochemical immunosensor is supported by their selectivity, sensitivity, versatility and simplicity and short analysis time (Bange et al, 2005); they also are renowned for their potential for miniaturization, portability and low cost. They have been successfully used in the detection of proteins, antibodies, bacteria and whole cells (Ghindilis et al, 1998;Kim et al, 2006;Melanson, 2007;Khaled et al, 2008;Konstantinov et al, 2009;Laczka et al, 2009;Mata et al, 2010). Many different classical strategies are employed to try and mimic the architecture of classical immunoassays on electrode surfaces; the assembly of the immunosensor with the attachment of antibodies or antigens on the surface can be carried out by several methods such as polymer or sol-gel entrapment (Ramanavicius et al, 2010) covalent attachment (Hays et al, 2006) or physical adsorption (Díaz-González et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%