2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue strength evaluation of linear flow split profile sections based on hardness distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the instantaneous fracture zone, its micro-failure mode is the additional static mode, the fatigue crack propagation rate at this time is quite sensitive to hardness. However, the fatigue crack propagation rates at this stage is so large that the effect of hardness is not significant [38].…”
Section: Comparison Of Fatigue Crack Propagation Behavior Between Bas...mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the instantaneous fracture zone, its micro-failure mode is the additional static mode, the fatigue crack propagation rate at this time is quite sensitive to hardness. However, the fatigue crack propagation rates at this stage is so large that the effect of hardness is not significant [38].…”
Section: Comparison Of Fatigue Crack Propagation Behavior Between Bas...mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In principle, the hardness can also be used to estimate the fatigue strength, given that there are approaches that relate hardness and fatigue properties such as the Coffin–Manson coefficients . An estimation based on the Medians method has shown to give a good approximation for the fatigue life of whole flanges . However, it is unclear whether such approximations still hold for more complex loading scenarios which require an estimation of local fatigue properties, which is extremely difficult to validate experimentally due to sample size limitations.…”
Section: Manufacturing‐induced Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other solutions concern strain damage parameters (Erdogan and Roberts (13) 23 , Bergmann (12) 24 ), which are more or less modifications of the SWT parameter with an additional material parameter for tuning the MSE. According to Landersheim, 26 Bergmann's solution 25 was originally provided in the following form: which results in k = 0.373 if the more general formula (12) is used for the material evaluated here. Nihei et al in Ref.…”
Section: Strain‐based Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%