2019
DOI: 10.3390/aerospace6070076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault Tolerant Control of an Experimental Flexible Wing

Abstract: Active control techniques are a key factor in today’s aircraft developments to reduce structural loads and thereby enable highly efficient aircraft designs. Likewise, increasing the autonomy of aircraft systems aims to maintain the highest degree of operational performance also in fault scenarios. Motivated by these two aspects, this article describes the design and validation of a fault tolerant gust load alleviation control system on a flexible wing in a wind tunnel. The baseline gust load alleviation contro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the open-loop case, however, the WRBM is still reduced since the mid and inner flaps are still in operation. After a fault detection time of a bit more than 1 s, which is reasonable as evaluated in [15], the GLA controller is reconfigured and dynamic control allocation is activated at around 5 s. From thereon, the demanded control effort is distributed to the two inner flaps while the command to the faulty actuator is set to zero. Clearly visible in Fig.…”
Section: B Dynamic Control Allocation Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to the open-loop case, however, the WRBM is still reduced since the mid and inner flaps are still in operation. After a fault detection time of a bit more than 1 s, which is reasonable as evaluated in [15], the GLA controller is reconfigured and dynamic control allocation is activated at around 5 s. From thereon, the demanded control effort is distributed to the two inner flaps while the command to the faulty actuator is set to zero. Clearly visible in Fig.…”
Section: B Dynamic Control Allocation Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar approach is followed in [14], where the control allocation problem is formulated in terms of a quadratic program instead of a linear program. Note that both dynamic control allocation and MPC do not only allow for effectively handling saturation effects but also actuator faults, see, e.g., [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of the quadratic program is to keep both δu$$ \delta u $$ and δτ$$ \delta \tau $$ at zero, where dedicated weightings ensure that redistribution is preferred over performance degradation. For more details on the design, tuning, and implementation of the overall gust load alleviation controller see References 6 and 52.…”
Section: Application Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control allocation scheme typically exploits the additional degrees of freedom from over-actuation to handle actuator constraints or minimize some performance criteria like energy consumption. This makes control allocation very attractive in various application fields such as road and all-terrain vehicles, [1][2][3] aerospace, [4][5][6] marine vehicles, 7,8 manipulators, 9 or bio-mechanical muscles. 10 However, if the virtual inputs cannot be adequately realized, for example, due to saturation of multiple actuators, closed-loop performance is usually degraded and in the worst case, stability issues may even arise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active load alleviation allows for notable structural mass savings, which will in turn lead to decreased fuel consumption and, thus, lower operating costs and less emissions. The German Aerospace Center (DLR) has investigated the benefits of an active load alleviation system by numerical simulations and by wind tunnel experiments within the internal research activity "KonTeKst" [1][2][3][4]. For the design of a suitable control law, a numerical model of the open-loop system is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%